RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: martes 26 de marzo de 2002 0:37 > > Nice to hear that, one comment, there is a > jakarta-tomcat-jasper > repository with code Costin and Mel did some time > ago as an initial > effort to refactor the 3.3 Jasper, i dont know which > is the state of the

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

OK, that'd be easier. :) I'll give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion. > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:59:00 -0800 (PST) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PLAN] New Jasper > X-X-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > I checked out jakarta-tomcat-jasper briefly looked at the files there. > I agree with you (and constin) that it can be used as a repository for > jasper2. > > However, files and directory structures are too different from the one > used in tomcat 4, an

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

and see if jasper2 should move in there. Thanks for the suggestion. > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:04:16 +0100 > From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [PLAN] New Jasper > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, '

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

>> May be because of license of javacc ;-) > >That hasn't stopped Velocity from using it. But in any case, there >was an announcement on the JavaCC list a couple of days ago >that JavaCC will be open sourced over the next few months. Excellent news ;-) will the license allow its distribution in

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

on of custom tags). It is much easier for a custom parser to just handle them as special cases. > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:17:12 -0600 > From: Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PLAN] New Jasper > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'Kin-Man

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Louis Tribble wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > > May be because of license of javacc ;-) > > That hasn't stopped Velocity from using it. But in any case, there > was an announcement on the JavaCC list a couple of days ago > that JavaCC will be open sourced over the next few

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

Henri Gomez wrote: > May be because of license of javacc ;-) That hasn't stopped Velocity from using it. But in any case, there was an announcement on the JavaCC list a couple of days ago that JavaCC will be open sourced over the next few months. Louis Tribble -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

JavaCC is owned by Sun. The license doesn't look any more restrictive than that of javac. Bob - Original Message - From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:18 AM Su

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

ob Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:17 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List; 'Kin-Man Chung' >Subject: Re: [PLAN] New Jasper > > >Possibly very stupid question... > >Is there any reason not to use JavaCC on the JSP compiler? I know the >gramm

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Kin-Man Chung'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:04 AM Subject: RE: [PLAN] New Jasper > > De: Kin-Man Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: martes 26 de

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

> De: Kin-Man Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: martes 26 de marzo de 2002 1:13 > Thanks for the pointer. I'll look at both places to see if there are > codes/ideas I can borrow. My comment was more geared toward the use of this repository, than to reuse the code there, i think is

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

"Kin-Man Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also would welcome ideas or suggestion about what and how to make jasper > better. Pier's is the first complain that I've heard about jasper > translation perfromance. :-) Not translation (I didn't explain myself right, was too late yesterday night

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > > > I have noticed that the current Jasper does a lot of string manipulations > > very slowly, e.g. there are unnecessary copying or concatenations, and > > the uses of String where StringBuffer should be used. Hopefully I can > > avoid all of these.

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > I wasn't really serious when I suggested that Jasper generates byte codes. Xalan is doing that already ( actually XSLTC ), and it's not very difficult since we generate quite simple code, unlikely to be optimized by javac too much. It'll work only f

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > > > I have noticed that the current Jasper does a lot of string manipulations > > very slowly, e.g. there are unnecessary copying or concatenations, and > > the uses of String where StringBuffer should be used. Hopefully I can > > avoid all of these

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

an be improved to the point that an user will notice, because the time spent in Jasper is probably small compared with that spent in javac. Now if we could have jasper generate byte code directly... > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:40:05 + > From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > I have noticed that the current Jasper does a lot of string manipulations > very slowly, e.g. there are unnecessary copying or concatenations, and > the uses of String where StringBuffer should be used. Hopefully I can > avoid all of these. > > But I

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

ue, 26 Mar 2002 00:47:12 +0100 > From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [PLAN] New Jasper > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'Kin-Man Chung' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-version: 1.0 > X-Priority

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > De: Kin-Man Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: martes 26 de marzo de 2002 0:37 > > Nice to hear that, one comment, there is a jakarta-tomcat-jasper > repository with code Costin and Mel did some time ago as an initial > effort to re

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > I have been doing it so far in my own sandbox. The reason for this is not > to keep it a secret, but to avoid de-stablizing the current tomcat, > since a lot of my early work was mainly experimental. There have > been interests recently in making the

RE: [PLAN] New Jasper

> De: Kin-Man Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: martes 26 de marzo de 2002 0:37 Nice to hear that, one comment, there is a jakarta-tomcat-jasper repository with code Costin and Mel did some time ago as an initial effort to refactor the 3.3 Jasper, i dont know which is the state of th

Re: [PLAN] New Jasper

"Kin-Man Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I plan to put back the new japser source tree in a day or two. If anyone has > comments, concerns, or objections, please let me know. Of course, anyone > interested in contributing to the new jasper development is also welcome. YES PLEASE :) It's qu