Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Larry Isaacs wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:55 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates http://jakarta.apache.org/~larryi/JmxSupport.war I take a look at this module and I

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Think about it - each app can expose config and status data to the mx layer, and the config app ( or another tool ) can manage not only tomcat, but also each webapp. JMX is not restricted to server code, it can ( and should) be used in user apps as well. And that's where things will be

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-26 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates Larry Isaacs wrote: A first pass implementation, derived from what you have done, can

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-26 Thread Larry Isaacs
I'll try to commit this tonight. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:38 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates Larry Isaacs wrote: -Original Message

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: Larry Isaacs wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:55 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates http://jakarta.apache.org/~larryi/JmxSupport.war I take a look

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Larry Isaacs wrote: -Original Message- From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates Larry Isaacs wrote: A first pass implementation, derived from what you

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: Think about it - each app can expose config and status data to the mx layer, and the config app ( or another tool ) can manage not only tomcat, but also each webapp. JMX is not restricted to server code, it can ( and should) be used in user apps as well. And that's where

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-25 Thread Henri Gomez
Larry Isaacs wrote: Hi Henri, The basic problem is that o.a.t.u.mx.DynamicMBeanProxy.java carries dependencies, which imposes requirements on the classloader hierarchy for any class that uses it. In this case the jmx, parser, and tranform jars would need to move to lib/common where

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-25 Thread Henri Gomez
http://jakarta.apache.org/~larryi/JmxSupport.war I take a look at this module and I really like it. What about using it and remove MxInterceptor ? Could we bundle this module in TC 3.3.2 ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-25 Thread Costin Manolache
(and will :) just edit my copy of j-t-c/util/build.xml). - Original Message - From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:10 PM Subject: RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates Hi Henri, The basic problem

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-25 Thread Costin Manolache
updates Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:38 AM Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates Larry Isaacs wrote: Hi Henri, I would prefer

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-25 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:55 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates http://jakarta.apache.org/~larryi/JmxSupport.war I take a look at this module and I really like

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-24 Thread Henri Gomez
Larry Isaacs wrote: Hi Henri, I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from 3.3.1 to 3.3.2. I agree with Costin that using 4 with documentation on the steps to enable the MxInterceptor would be a resonable way to implement this. So I'll have to take a look at MxInterceptor to

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-24 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:38 AM Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates Larry Isaacs wrote: Hi Henri, I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from 3.3.1

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-24 Thread Henri Gomez
Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:38 AM Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates Larry Isaacs wrote: Hi Henri, I would prefer to minimize the impact

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-23 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, If you tracked the discussion about MxInterceptor and it's use in Tomcat 3.3.2-dev you should know that we have some modification to Tomcat 3.3.2 jars layout to be able to use MxInterceptor : 1) mx4j and mx4j-tools should goes in lib/common 2)

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-23 Thread Larry Isaacs
Hi Henri, I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from 3.3.1 to 3.3.2. I agree with Costin that using 4 with documentation on the steps to enable the MxInterceptor would be a resonable way to implement this. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

2002-09-23 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 00:01, Henri Gomez wrote: Thanks to give your opinion here. [X] 1. Don't care about MBeans, or do want to be able to have different XML apis for apps and container, so keep the current situation. [ ] 2. MxInterceptor is really needed, ok to change