Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
Well, it seems that the consensus is for the default servlet. That's where I'll make the changes for 3.3. - Original Message - From: "Keith Wannamaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 20

RE: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Keith Wannamaker
Hi Bill, I am partial to handling it in the default servlet. I agree the root context can't speak definitively for all contexts, but I think it has a better chance of knowing a proper response than the connector. Keith | -Original Message- | From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:29 PM Subject: Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL Bill Barker wrote: This is really

Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:29 PM Subject: Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL > Bill Barker wrote: > > This is really

Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-10 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: This is really a Request-For-Comments, I'm not proposing anything. I'm looking into resolving Bug #21454. At the moment, requests for e.g: OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1 TRACE * HTTP/1.1 get properly handled by TC 5 (thanks to Keith's patch), buy passing them to DefaultServlet. However