>
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
>
Considering all expressed opinions (Costin included) I think
Christopher already wrapped up the whole mess going on here in a
previous post, and I quote:
AFAIK, everyone is in agreement that all bug entries will be in
one of the CLOSED states (RESOLVED, POSTPONED, or CAN'T-REPRODUCE)
before
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
>
> > > I don't know what 'long enough' means, my impression is that we had
> a
> > > far too long release cycle for 3.3 already.
> >
> > Don't worry Costin, he doesn't really know what it means either :)
>
> Well, giving
, September 10, 2001 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
>
> > > I don't know what 'long enough' means, my impression is that we had a
> > > far too long release cycle for 3.
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, William Barker wrote:
>
> > For what it's worth (since I can't vote), I agree with Jon. TC3.3
hasn't
> > had
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
> > I don't know what 'long enough' means, my impression is that we had a
> > far too long release cycle for 3.3 already.
>
> Don't worry Costin, he doesn't really know what it means either :)
Well, giving the bug reports he filled so far - he seems t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> I don't know what 'long enough' means, my impression is that we had a
> far too long release cycle for 3.3 already.
Don't worry Costin, he doesn't really know what it means either :)
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et fondez vous en eau!
*
e for 3.3 already.
Of course, if any major bug shows up - we'll postpone the release as much
as it's needed to fix it.
Costin
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "tomcat-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)
Okay, okay ... let's not start getting goofy here. As I don't remember
L
Okay, okay ... let's not start getting goofy here. As I don't remember
Larry every insinuating that his decision to release was simply to "keep
up with 4.0", let's leave the rather insulting and uninformed
speculation at home, shall we?
Knowing Larry, I'm not inclined to think that his decisio
"William Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keeping up with 4.0 isn't a good enough reason, since I'm sure that
> there are plenty of people like me who can't even think of moving to 4.0
> until it has release-quality connectors.
I know... Working on it as fast as I can to fix bugs, and thank
Jon Stevens wrote:
[snip]
> If T4.0 FINAL has bugs not in VERIFIED/CLOSED state, then I'm going
> to vote -1 on its release.
FWIW, I agree with that sentiment; but to the best of my knowledge, so
does everyone else. Given that, I really don't anticipate a problem
here. AFAIK, everyone is in
ason, since I'm sure that
there are plenty of people like me who can't even think of moving to 4.0
until it has release-quality connectors.
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tomcat-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monda
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, thank you Pier !
I believe I'm just being fair... We have our disagreements on most of the
technical aspects of the code, that's why, to my disappointment too, we have
TWO releases coming out in parallel, but, as I said last week to Henri, th
on 9/10/01 2:13 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer access, it
> means that we trust them. If they say that 3.3 is ready to go, well, I'm not
> going to stop them because FIRST I never contributed a line of code, SECON
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
>
> I'm also worried about regression testing.
Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer acc
on 9/10/01 1:44 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll read that as:
> "There shouldn't be any confirmed bugs above at major or higher severity
> open in the bug database". Otherwise, I disagree with your statement.
> We can still release if there are some, but that will need a vo
Even if this is a majority vote, and so far we seem to have the votes we
need for the release, I think Jon is right on not releasing unless all
the bugs are evaluated and we fix all the bugs that we think are important
and don't destabilize the release.
For 3.3 there is only one reopened bug ( w
> on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
>
> I'm also worried about regression testing.
>
> >, whereas
> > there are 26 on Tomcat 4.0 currently open, and you didn't vote -1 on
4.0's
> > release plan.
on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
I'm also worried about regression testing.
>, whereas
> there are 26 on Tomcat 4.0 currently open, and you didn't vote -1 on 4.0's
> release plan... I'm not tryi
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
>>> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
>>> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
>>> [ ]
on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
>> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
>> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
>> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
>> [X] -1I am
"Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my re
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
> ===
>= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
>[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
>[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
>[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
>[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
>==
= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[X] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
+1
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
>
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/10/01 08:51AM >>>
>Hi All,
>
>I propose to update the RELEASE-PLAN-3.3 with the schedule shown
>below to finish the release of Jakarta Tomcat 3.3.
>
>= Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
>[X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
>[ ] +0I am in
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
>
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [X] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
