On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >I think the only compatibility that matters is 3.2.3
> >working with the new mod_jk.
>
> If you use latest mod_jk (JTC or JT 3.3) with TC 3.2.3
> you won't have any problems.
>
> But if you try 3.2.3 mod_jk with JT 3.3, you are stuck.
What whould any
>| -Original Message-
>| What about that patch which allways set ContentLength
>| but try to get others datas only in contentLength is set
>| and not -1
>|
>|
>| --- Ajp13.java.orig Mon Sep 17 11:16:05 2001
>| +++ Ajp13.java Mon Sep 17 11:16:30 2001
>| @@ -411,8 +411,8 @@
>|
>I think the only compatibility that matters is 3.2.3
>working with the new mod_jk.
If you use latest mod_jk (JTC or JT 3.3) with TC 3.2.3
you won't have any problems.
But if you try 3.2.3 mod_jk with JT 3.3, you are stuck.
>We should recomend people to upgrade at least mod_jk to
>3.3/jk or j-
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> The works conducted on ajp13 in TC 3.3 to add chunk
> support and better handling of the content-length,
> have broken compatibility with previous mod_jk.
I think the only compatibility that matters is 3.2.3
working with the new mod_jk.
| -Original Message-
| What about that patch which allways set ContentLength
| but try to get others datas only in contentLength is set
| and not -1
|
|
| --- Ajp13.java.orig Mon Sep 17 11:16:05 2001
| +++ Ajp13.javaMon Sep 17 11:16:30 2001
| @@ -411,8 +411,8 @@
| Me