RE: Ajp13 change in recent TC 3.3

2001-09-17 Thread cmanolache
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >I think the only compatibility that matters is 3.2.3 > >working with the new mod_jk. > > If you use latest mod_jk (JTC or JT 3.3) with TC 3.2.3 > you won't have any problems. > > But if you try 3.2.3 mod_jk with JT 3.3, you are stuck. What whould any

RE: Ajp13 change in recent TC 3.3

2001-09-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>| -Original Message- >| What about that patch which allways set ContentLength >| but try to get others datas only in contentLength is set >| and not -1 >| >| >| --- Ajp13.java.orig Mon Sep 17 11:16:05 2001 >| +++ Ajp13.java Mon Sep 17 11:16:30 2001 >| @@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ >|

RE: Ajp13 change in recent TC 3.3

2001-09-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I think the only compatibility that matters is 3.2.3 >working with the new mod_jk. If you use latest mod_jk (JTC or JT 3.3) with TC 3.2.3 you won't have any problems. But if you try 3.2.3 mod_jk with JT 3.3, you are stuck. >We should recomend people to upgrade at least mod_jk to >3.3/jk or j-

Re: Ajp13 change in recent TC 3.3

2001-09-17 Thread cmanolache
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Hi to all, > > The works conducted on ajp13 in TC 3.3 to add chunk > support and better handling of the content-length, > have broken compatibility with previous mod_jk. I think the only compatibility that matters is 3.2.3 working with the new mod_jk.

RE: Ajp13 change in recent TC 3.3

2001-09-17 Thread Keith Wannamaker
| -Original Message- | What about that patch which allways set ContentLength | but try to get others datas only in contentLength is set | and not -1 | | | --- Ajp13.java.orig Mon Sep 17 11:16:05 2001 | +++ Ajp13.javaMon Sep 17 11:16:30 2001 | @@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ | Me