Re: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString - IMPORTANT!

> Thanks to George C. Hawkins for clearing up the > specification and to Pier Fumagalli for correcting the > spelling of my last name. Oops sorry about the misspelling - it genuinely wasn't intentional - Freudian slip maybe :-) Sorry if my first e-mail was a bit dogmatic. > It is now clear that

RE: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString - IMPORTANT!

ote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, George C. Hawkins wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:52:32 +0100 > > From: George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &

RE: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString - IMPORTANT!

On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, George C. Hawkins wrote: > Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:52:32 +0100 > From: George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > George C. Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString - IMPORTANT!

"George C. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's "patch" should be applied. As has been > pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for > the JSP and servlet JCRs. Robert LUCIER... There's no "F" between the "I" and the "E"... He's not an

RE: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString - IMPORTANT!

I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's "patch" should be applied. As has been pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for the JSP and servlet JCRs. In the Servlet 2.3 PFD2 specification you find the following in the definition of parseQueryString(): "The query string shoul

RE: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString

Thanks for the advice. Attached is the patch against the latest CVS source. --- "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola Robert: > > Please follow the guidelines > when > submitting patches.. > > Thanks for the feedback.. > > Saludos ,

RE: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString

Hola Robert: Please follow the guidelines when submitting patches.. Thanks for the feedback.. Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: Robert Lucier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: sábado 1 de septiembre de 2001 0:36

Re: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString

Was this information sufficient? I would be happy to make a patch to the latest source, or better explain my rationale for the fix. --- Robert Lucier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My apologies. That was against the > jarkarta-servletapi-3.2.3 source. The file is > javax.servlet.http.HttpUtils.ja

Re: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString

My apologies. That was against the jarkarta-servletapi-3.2.3 source. The file is javax.servlet.http.HttpUtils.java. --- Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Robert Lucier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Attatched is a fix for > > HttpUtils.parseQueryString(String s) which allows > a >

Re: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString

"Robert Lucier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attatched is a fix for > HttpUtils.parseQueryString(String s) which allows a > key-only key value pair like "b" in "a=1&b&c=2". This > is necessary to work with some clients, and should not > break anything else. It interprets the above as b="", > inst