George C. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's patch should be applied. As has been
pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for
the JSP and servlet JCRs.
Robert LUCIER... There's no F between the I and the E... He's not an
evil guy (or
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, George C. Hawkins wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:52:32 +0100
From: George C. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
George C. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bug/Fix for HttpUtils.parseQueryString
+0100
From: George C. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
George C. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bug/Fix for
HttpUtils.parseQueryString - IMPORTANT!
I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's patch should be
applied
Thanks to George C. Hawkins for clearing up the
specification and to Pier Fumagalli for correcting the
spelling of my last name.
Oops sorry about the misspelling - it genuinely wasn't intentional - Freudian
slip maybe :-) Sorry if my first e-mail was a bit dogmatic.
It is now clear that
I do not believe Mr. Lucifer's patch should be applied. As has been
pointed out a number of times Tomcat is the reference implementation for
the JSP and servlet JCRs.
In the Servlet 2.3 PFD2 specification you find the following in the
definition of parseQueryString():
The query string should
