Re: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Since there is no major showstoppers and > a) The vhosts should work now > b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved > > Here is the release plan: > > 1. 09/25/2002 - Freeze the further development. > > 2. 09/26/2002 - If there is no major bugs tag the release as JK2_2_0_0 >

Re: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

+1 and thanks for steping up :-) Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Since there is no major showstoppers and > a) The vhosts should work now > b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved > > Here is the release plan: > > 1. 09/25/2002 - Freeze the further development. > > 2. 09/26/2002 - If there is no major

RE: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

Contin wrote: > > Let's call this a 'milestone' or 'build', as is done in 4.x > and apache. > So JK2_0_BETA as tag name and jk2.0-beta as build name, but I would reather prefer only numbers an just said "OK jk-2.0.0 is Beta version". MT. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

> De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 24 de septiembre de 2002 13:28 > > > Hi, > > Since there is no major showstoppers and > a) The vhosts should work now > b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved > Thanks for volunteer, and thanks for the fixes.. > Here is the release plan: >

RE: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

Mladen Turk wrote: > Contin wrote: >> >> Let's call this a 'milestone' or 'build', as is done in 4.x >> and apache. >> > > So JK2_0_BETA as tag name and jk2.0-beta as build name, but > I would reather prefer only numbers an just said "OK jk-2.0.0 is Beta > version". I think the way it works (

Re: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

+1 Sounds good. If you find nobody to build for Apache 2.0.4x on Linux, let me know. Bojan On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 21:27, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Since there is no major showstoppers and > a) The vhosts should work now > b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved > > Here is the release plan: > > 1. 0