RE: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> Because that's what the "Redistribution" paragraph of the >license that you >> had to click through says you can do and not do. (See why >it's a good >> idea to actually *read* these things? :-) >Craig, you've still not answered precisely to my question. >Please explain us >if what we are

Re: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-29 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Craig R. McClanahan : > > I'd like to clarify. I could have activation, javamail, jdbc-ext, > > jndi, jta, which are Sun products, included in a Tomcat tarball > > but couldn't have them included in a separate tarball ? > > Yes. > > > Thanks to explain us why ? > > Because that's wha

Re: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-25 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Craig R. McClanahan : > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:04:36 +0100 > > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Major problem w

Re: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-24 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Craig R. McClanahan : [..] > > Thanks to explain us why ? > > Because that's what the "Redistribution" paragraph of the license that you > had to click through says you can do and not do. (See why it's a good > idea to actually *read* these things? :-) AFAK, the part of the Sun Bin