Hi,
Code changes to jakarta-servletapi are still 'special' - since it must
be an exact copy of the spec. But I see no reason for watchdog - it was
supposed to be the semi-official test suite, but now Sun provides an
official one, so watchdog is useless anyway.
Watchdog is dormant. As such,
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Need to identify just how much of the jakarta-* CVS will go with
Tomcat. Watchdog + ServletAPI modules?
That's undecided. Would the old projects would remain at Jakarta, or
would they be covered by the new project ?
Why would they remain in jakarta ? They have the same
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Need to identify just how much of the jakarta-* CVS will go with
Tomcat. Watchdog + ServletAPI modules
On Apr 8, 2005 11:19 PM, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Need to identify just how much
- Original Message -
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
On Apr 8, 2005 11:19 PM, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Costin
generated spam is a
bad practice.
Regards
Jan H. Hansen
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 2005 19:41
Til: Tomcat Developers List
Emne: Re: New TLP draft
Looks good. Just an idea, it may be nice to have the 3 new lists
tomcat-bug - bug
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: SV: New TLP draft
+1
I think burrying new potential contributors in auto generated spam is a
bad practice.
Regards
Jan H. Hansen
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 2005 19:41
Til: Tomcat Developers List
Emne: Re: New
Tim Funk wrote:
The main use case is when I lurked in geronimo. When a build in geronimo
fails - it creates a *massive* email which I as a lurker really don't
care about. It also took forever to download of a highspeed line. I also
recevied wiki updates when subscribed to the cvs commits which
True. But do others really need to see the GUMP message if they don't want
them? Since I should be reading the GUMP failures - it is mandatory for me to
see them. But for any other dev lists one is subscribed to (but not
committing) - do you really care that the latest build failed? Since the
- Original Message -
From: Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
True. But do others really need to see the GUMP message if they don't want
them? Since I should be reading
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
To answer
not sure if this is important or not, but how should the migration of
the mailing list happen? everyone subscribing to tomcat-user an
tomcat-dev automatically get subscribed to the new one?
peter
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
Is that just keeping both lists and moving them up the domain
Hi,
Is that just keeping both lists and moving them up the domain hierarchy,
or is there a move to
change the list names while we're at it?
I think we're keeping the same list names, but moving the domain.
- PMC chairs will serve for one year, and cannot serve consecutive one
year terms
Ian F. Darwin wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
Is that just keeping both lists and
Yoav Shapira wrote:
BTW, the struts project recently went through this and ended up with I think
are a decent set of by-laws.
Very good :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
you mean at the speed of light. It's already April, so they only have
5-6 months if they really want to get plugin out that matches the
current CVS support.
peter
On Apr 6, 2005 11:37 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They'd have to improve a lot very fast (from what was posted, CVS
It appears that my name (Kin-man Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]) has been
dropped from the PMC. Hope this is not intentional. :-)
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 05:15, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If
Looks good. Just an idea, it may be nice to have the 3 new lists
tomcat-bug - bug updates from bugzilla. When I subscribe to other groups - I
sometimes do not care about bug updates and need to write filters to
automatically delete them. I am guessing some others might be more interested
in the
Tim Funk wrote:
Looks good. Just an idea, it may be nice to have the 3 new lists
tomcat-bug - bug updates from bugzilla. When I subscribe to other groups
tomcat-cvs - Same as tomcat-bug but just for cvs commits.
tomcat-gump - For deaths by gump. If your not a committer - these are
This has
21 matches
Mail list logo
