Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > [snip] > The addition of GlobalNamingResources and the UserDatabase slipped below > my radar somehow. I looked at the latest server.xml from CVS. I grep'd > the docs in CVS and didn't notice anything in the docs about these yet. > > The addition of G

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:53:52 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 JDBC

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > > Personally, I like the latter idea better (a new JDBCRealm implementation > that uses a JNDI named data source) to avoid disruption of existing > applications. Yes, I agree. Internal Catalina components can now use JNDI in the HEAD bra

RE: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Mensaje original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En > nombre de Glenn Nielsen > Enviado el: miƩrcoles 13 de febrero de 2002 17:25 > Should this support be added to the current JDBCRealm, or should a new > realm be created which uses a JNDI named JDBC DataSource? >

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:25:07 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling > > Currently the JDBCRealm does not use db