an existing
version can continued to be used. Which is our case is handy.
We might look at 4.1.3x in a few months depending on issues with 4.1.29.
Thanks anyway!
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 February 2004 19:33
> To: [EMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This seemed to be an issue with tomcat 4.1.24.
>
> Using 4.1.29 resolves this issue.
>
> Thanks for the pointers, especially the one to open my eyes and check
> which tomcat version I was using.
While you're at it, you should upgrade to 4.1.30 which fixes some memory
l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 February 2004 21:43
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: RE: jk2 buglets II
>
>
> On Mon, February 23, 2004 1at 0:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Does restarting the Tomcat instance free up the stuck processes?
> >
> > Yup.
On Mon, February 23, 2004 1at 0:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Does restarting the Tomcat instance free up the stuck processes?
>
> Yup. Apache seems to recover fine, as the socket gets reset.
OK, can you figure out what Tomcat is doing when these processes get
stuck? It seems that you may h
> Does restarting the Tomcat instance free up the stuck processes?
>
> -Dave
>
Yup. Apache seems to recover fine, as the socket gets reset.
Greg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 2/23/2004 8:37 AM:
We seem to have another buglet with mod_jk2 2.0.2. We seem to be unable to
recreate the bug using ab, but when one of our busiest servers has been
running for a few hours we get apache children "stuck" (at times upto 100
children are blocked, which is
>
> > Which Tomcat on the remote side ?
> >
> > 3.3, 4.0, 4.1, 5.0 ?
>
> Sorry forgot that:
Sorry being an idiot. This is presently on 4.1.24.
Leave this with me... I've made a mistake and need to retest with 4.1.29.
Due to having to qualify (extensively test and document) out installs we ar
> Which Tomcat on the remote side ?
>
> 3.3, 4.0, 4.1, 5.0 ?
Sorry forgot that:
4.1.29 with jdk 1.4.2_02
Greg
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We seem to have another buglet with mod_jk2 2.0.2. We seem to be unable to
recreate the bug using ab, but when one of our busiest servers has been
running for a few hours we get apache children "stuck" (at times upto 100
children are blocked, which is how we found the iss
