Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-02 Thread costinm
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for a vote on it, now that the discussions have died > down. > > > [X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > [ ] +0 I support the proposal >

RE: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread GOMEZ Henri
> >[X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it >[ ] +0 I support the proposal >[ ] -0 I do not support the proposal >[ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Mladen Turk
[X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it [ ] +0 I support the proposal [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: MT. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Larry Isaacs
> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:57 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal > > > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for

RE: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Shailendra Singh Negi
[x] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it [ ] +0 I support the proposal [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: -Shailendra -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Ben Galbraith
[X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it [ ] +0 I support the proposal [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: Long time user, first time voter. Looking forward to coding and writing documentation for Tomcat 4.x and

RE: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
+1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 3 de julio de 2002 1:57 > Para: Tomcat Developers List > Asunto: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal > > > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Ben Galbraith
+1 on proposal. I have a lot of interested in coding and/or writing documentation for Tomcat 5.0. I'll look for opportunities to jump in, but if someone has any Tomcat 4.x or Tomcat 5 projects awaiting a coder or a tech. writer, please do let me know. On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 05:57 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 09:57, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > [ ] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > [X] +0 I support the proposal > [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal > [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: > Which might actually turn out to be +0.01 ;-)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-03 Thread Bill Barker
> > [X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > [ ] +0 I support the proposal > [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal > [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-05 Thread Denis Benoit
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for a vote on it, now that the discussions have died > down. > > > [X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > [ ] +0 I support the proposal >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ ] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > [X] +0 I support the proposal > [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal > [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: > As long as the interfaces don't change too much (espec

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-05 Thread Bob Herrmann
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 19:57, Remy Maucherat wrote: > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for a vote on it, now that the discussions have died > down. > > > [X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > [ ] +0 I support the pro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-08 Thread jean-frederic clere
+1 Remy Maucherat wrote: > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for a vote on it, now that the discussions have died > down. > > > [ ] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > [ ] +0 I support the proposal > [ ] -0 I do not s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
> As long as the interfaces don't change too much (especially, Container and > Component, all the rest I don't care). We started out process of stripping > out "for good" all the stuff distributed with TC4x, working on some new > startup classes and so on (and looking over at the excellent work m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-08 Thread Kin-Man Chung
+1. I'll populate jasper2 and servlet-api with initial changes for JSP2.0 support. > Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:57:20 -0700 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > After trying to address the con

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-10 Thread Christopher K. St. John
Probably a little late: > > > > [X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > > [ ] +0 I support the proposal > > [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal > > [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: > > Actually, I'm probably closer to a +0 for the next few week

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

2002-07-15 Thread Amy Roh
Sorry for the late vote. I've been on vacation for last two weeks. But for the record, you have my +1. Thanks, Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for a vote on it, now that the discussions have died > down. > >