Re: Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 - AJP14 continuation

2001-05-12 Thread Andrey Kartashov
Sorry for not replying back sooner. I just wanted to look at the latest stuff from CVS ( I used to look at my local CVS repository which is based on TC3.2.1). Couldn't do it sooner - had to to some other things first:) In case you, guys still interested - here it goes:) First I'd like to apologi

Re: Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 - AJP14 continuation

2001-05-08 Thread cmanolache
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Andrey Kartashov wrote: > What I'm trying to say is: > To address this group of people I'd suggest splitting distribution into > "pure java" Tomcat part + extensions. This way only NECESSARY files will > make their way to "conf" directory. If someone is (for example) intereste

Re: Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 - AJP14 continuation

2001-05-08 Thread Andrey Kartashov
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:49:25PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >Should it become default? I hope the answer is yes:) > >It also has another value: "inet" is not a well-known > >parameter. Having it in default server.xml along with a little > >comment about > >what it does may compensate for the

RE: Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 - AJP14 continuation

2001-05-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
> >Should it become default? I hope the answer is yes:) > >It also has another value: "inet" is not a well-known >parameter. Having it in default server.xml along with a little >comment about >what it does may compensate for the lack of proper documentation:) +1 for the addition in server.xml (M