Remy,
I posted that _OLD_ proposal from 3/13/01 as an example of how I
documented the behaviour of tomcat for managing web apps. It was
not meant as a current proposal. Just as a place to start a discussion.
Well, I didn't like it so far.
Could either you or Craig fully document what
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:18:39 -0600
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 4.1-dev Host unpackWARs not working
The Host attribute unpackWARs=true
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:41:40 -0600
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1-dev Host unpackWARs not working
Craig R
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:57:55 -0600
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1-dev Host unpackWARs not working
Craig R
[PROPOSAL]
-1 for this proposal (sorry, but I really *hate* it).
To paraphrase a bit:
If unpack=false then unpack.
If unpack=true then unpack somewhere else.
Otehrwise, both do the same.
The current behavior will hopefully encourage people not to rely on the
filesystem and use more portable
