RE: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

>> > >> > It has all to do with "standards". Tabs have been used for >indentation >for >> > at least the last 15 years ( that's when I started playing with >computers- >> > and the tab was there ). >> >> But the point is that we're using SPACES... Since _EVER_... >Discussion >> closed. > >I real

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > It has all to do with "standards". Tabs have been used for indentation for > > at least the last 15 years ( that's when I started playing with computers- > > and the tab was there ). > > But the point is that we're using SPACES... Since _EVER

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It has all to do with "standards". Tabs have been used for indentation for > at least the last 15 years ( that's when I started playing with computers- > and the tab was there ). But the point is that we're using SPACES... Since _EVER_... Discuss

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > >> on 5/26/01 10:18 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> +{ >>> +return oldCookieFormat.format( d ); >>> } >> >> I thought we weren't using tab's in the files anymore... > >

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

on 5/27/01 6:45 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It has all to do with "standards". Tabs have been used for indentation for > at least the last 15 years ( that's when I started playing with computers- > and the tab was there ). Great! I have you beat. I started creating softw

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

on 5/27/01 5:54 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a matter of principle here - the fact that some mail clients or > editors chose to ignore standards and common practices doesn't mean the > standard itself is bad and shouldn't be used. > > Costin Making developers jump t

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

on 5/27/01 5:25 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon, try to write more code and less mail. Once again, you completely miss the point Costin. Your code isn't any good if people can't read the diff's that go into CVS because they don't format correctly in email clients becaus

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

on 5/27/01 5:04 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html > > > Costin Costin, you are being stupid (again). "However, some projects may decide to override these defaults and use their own defined conventions." -jon

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

on 5/27/01 4:01 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are using tabs AFAIK ( or at least I am using tabs and I don't > remember any vote or official rule that says this is not allowed ). > > > Costin -

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

on 5/26/01 10:18 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +// Called from MessageBytes.setTime > +/** > + */ > +public static String format1123( Date d ) { > +return rfc1123Format.format( d ); > +} > + > + > +// Called from ServerCookie > +/** > +