Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-19 Thread Henri Gomez
Larry Isaacs wrote: I hope to spend some cycles advancing a Tomcat 3.3.2 release over the holidays. I'm not assuming I can finish, but hopefully a Tomcat 3.3.2 release can be made in January. I'll also try to get back up to speed with Tomcat 4 & 5 and J-T-C. I can try to help with the glog fact

RE: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-19 Thread Costin Manolache
Larry Isaacs wrote: > I hope to spend some cycles advancing a Tomcat 3.3.2 release > over the holidays. I'm not assuming I can finish, but hopefully > a Tomcat 3.3.2 release can be made in January. I'll also try > to get back up to speed with Tomcat 4 & 5 and J-T-C. I hope we'll reach a decisio

RE: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-19 Thread Larry Isaacs
if I find time before Bill does. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging > > > Bill Barker wrote: > &g

Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-19 Thread Costin Manolache
Bill Barker wrote: >> > Last time I checked, o.a.t.u.log.Log already implements o.a.c.l.Log. >> >> I know, but it needs a factory and manifest to be useable >> as a c-l impl. ( I never tried it - it may work if someone already >> added this ) > > I'll look into adding a factory to qlog (since I

Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-18 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging > Bill Barker wrote: > > >> Is it ok if I change util.thread and util.net

Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-18 Thread Costin Manolache
Bill Barker wrote: >> Is it ok if I change util.thread and util.net to commons-logging ? >> That would mean c-l will be required for tomcat3.3, and thread >> and net would use c-l instead of the Log. > > TC 3.3.2-dev already requires c-l. The o.a.t.u.** classes in j-t are > already using it. So

Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-18 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging > Is it ok if I change util.thread and util.net to commons-logging ? > That would m

j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

2002-12-18 Thread Costin Manolache
Is it ok if I change util.thread and util.net to commons-logging ? That would mean c-l will be required for tomcat3.3, and thread and net would use c-l instead of the Log. It should be easy to modify the util.Log implementation in 3.3 to support commons-logging API, or implement util.Log using co