IMHO avoid JK2
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially
> unsupported.
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1
>
> We're in the process of config
I've never heard of being able to connect using SSL without a server
certificate. But you don't have to spend money to get one: just use a
self-signed certificate.
Onkar Singh wrote:
Hi ,
I want Client ( Web Browser) to be authenticated and not the
Server ( Web Server).
Hi all!
My env is:
sun_jdk142_04 + JBoss323 + Tomcat 4.1.29
I have the chain of 4 included pages a1.jsp includes a2.jsp, a2.jsp
includes a3.jsp etc...
each include looks like:
a1:
at the start of each jsp I wrote
<%@ page buffer="2048kb"%> // much more than I need
<%@ page autoFlush="false" %>
hi,
i've succesfully setup tomcat on by rh9 box. when i try upload the file
test.jsp to my boxm, i try to access my domain1 tomcat show the error
404. but the files is exist in my host domain1. i try add 1 more host
domain2 and upload it. it still same. when i put the test.jsp
to /home/tomcat/
test please ignore
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How come that you need an Oracle client installation at all when you
just want to use the Oracle thin JDBC driver? IHMO the client
installation is only required for OCI thick drivers...
Brad Rhoads wrote:
We have an (struts) app that talks to an Oracle 8i database. Our latest
installation wants
