Uses up more of those idle resources. No, there is no reason to use Apache if all you are serving is dynamic pages.
At 06:20 PM 10/1/2001 -0700, you wrote: >If you're committed to a project where virtually all of the pages will be >dynamically generated, through JSP most likely, and you're committed to using >Tomcat, is there ANY good reason to use Apache, in addition to Tomcat? > >I surveyed the FAQ, and I didn't notice this question being specifically >addressed. AFAIU, Apache is good for serving static pages or resources. If >you're only serving dynamic content, it only serves to complicate the >deployment, and serves no useful purpose. > >Can anyone give me any opposing viewpoint, assuming a dynamic webapp with >Tomcat? > >-- >=================================================================== >David M. Karr ; Best Consulting >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Java/Unix/XML/C++/X ; BrainBench CJ12P (#12004) Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company
