2, apache 2.0.13 problems
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:48:11 +0200
>
> On Tuesday 30 November 2004 06:29, dawg fan wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> > We just reloaded many of our front-end servers to suse 9.1 from
> > suse 8.2. This release of suse of course has the new 2.6 k
Hello,
We just reloaded many of our front-end servers to suse 9.1 from suse 8.2. This
release of suse of course has the new 2.6 kernel with a few other changes.
That is the only change as we used the same tomcat 5.0.27, mod_jk2, and apache
2.0.13 configurations from the previous 8.2 server.
I get the following error in apache's error logs while testing tomcat
under extreme load:
[Tue Aug 17 14:15:25 2004] [error] channelApr.receive(): Error
receiving message body -1 11
[Tue Aug 17 14:15:25 2004] [error] workerEnv.processCallbacks() Error
reading reply
[Tue Aug 17 14:15:25 2004] [err
Hello,
Has anyone done any research into performance results from unix sockets vs. channel
sockets vs. apr sockets?
I am currently loading apache2, mod_jk2, and tomcat 5. I would like to know the
difference in performance for the 3 sockets.
I was using apache 1.3, mod_jk, and tomcat 4.1.30
>From personal experience in testing on Suse 8.2 and tomcat 4.1.30 using a load of
>1000 concurrent connections pulling continuous pages from the webserver, the
>following was found:
- using ibm jdk and blackdown jdk (basically same thing) gave the fastest serve times
for the first hour of testi
To make it automatically startup on boot in linux, setup a link in /etc/init.d/rc3.d.
To do this, make your tomcat startup script live at /etc/init.d/tomcat. Then run
"insserv tomcat" or "ln -s /etc/init.d/tomcat /etc/init.d/rc3.d/tomcat" as the root
user. There are several other methods, bu
