now that we are pretty much on an agreement that jk2 is not
usable on a unix platform, we should concentrate on mod_jk :)
with tomcat 4.1, dev team decided that jk2 is ready and enabled
it on the tomcat side by default (so I heard). The question is:
if I use mod_jk.so on the apache side, do I nee
As I mentioned in other posts, all the success stories I've
seen so far are with Microsoft Windows platform.
Is that me or someone else can imply from the response
in that bug report that the developer also uses Microsoft Windows?
Frank
Rahul Bhargava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://nagoya.ap
> "This Guy Thinks He Knows What He Is Doing"
> -Original Message-
> From: liug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: February 12, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connector issues - jk2, 4.1.18, 2.0.44
> Eric L. Wittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If I don't put apr.NativeSo, there is no error in Catalina.out. However,
> there is no channelUnix either.
> If I put apr.nativeSo, I got that error.
> Regards,
>
>
> PQ
>
> "This Guy Thinks He Knows Everything"
> "This Guy Thinks He Knows What
Eric L. Wittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Map the Tomcat examples webapp to the Web server uri space
> [uri:/examples/*]
> info=Map the whole webapp
> In my Tomcat 4.1.18 conf directory, my jk2.properties files contains the
> folloing:
> handler.list=apr,channelSocket,request
> channelSocket.
Rahul,
I guess the jk2 developers are using Microsoft Windows platform.
I've seen several success stories on mod_jk2/JNI inprocess.
You might want to take a look at the C files for the mod_jk2.dll
My guess is those C files are doing the "right" job.
(registering the handlers).
Frank
Rahul Bhargav
compile of mod_jk2 is not an issue. it is pretty straight forward.
but whether you can config and make it work is another story :)
If you are one of those lucky Microsoft Windows user, I do
see some success posts. On Unix, no one got JNI in process
working with mod_jk2 (isn't that one of the main
Another happy Microsoft Windows user :)
I tried exactly same config as you did (see my other post) but
it just doesn't want to work on Linux :(
Frank
Rahul Bhargava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Found my problem after building a debug build of mod_jk2 and going thru the
> debugger. It
> was failin
I am having the same problem mod_jk2, tomcat 4.1.18, apache2,
but on linux.
I am wondering if mod_jk2/jni inprocess works for Unix (solaris or linux).
All the success stories that I've seen are on Microsoft Windows.
I tried to minic their config files with no luck.
the connector builds fine and I
Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "liug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> b24kvg$7ku$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b24kvg$7ku$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> mod_jk2 (tomcat 4.1.18) seems to compile fine with apache13,
>> but only "mod_jk2.so&q
One advice I can give is to stay away from mod_jk2. Though
jakarta website says all good words about it over the old
mod_jk, it is simply NOT ready. Your life will be much easier
if you start with mod_jk. I just read John's howto at
http://www.johnturner.com/howto and noticed he is
pretty much agre
> One difference I noticed -- I have jkjni.so in =
> $APACHE_HOME/lib/jkjni.so. I
> don't know if that makes a difference, maybe the default loc is now
> $APACHE_HOME/modules or maybe it doesn't make a difference in 4.1.18 =
> TC.
> Paul
Where exactly should jkjni.so live?
the official tomcat do
I had the same errors on linux (mod_jk2 4.1.18).
I did a google search and all the success stories with mod_jk2/jni
are on Microsoft Windows. Anybody know if mod_jk2 jni inprocess
work under Unix?
Francesa Lacreativa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --0-497224639-1044915285=:59810
> Content-Type: tex
I had the same error with channelUnix.
and if I try the jni, it gives some other errors that looks the same
as some other users have reported.
The question is
does mod_jk2 work on Unix, other than the Socket channel?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yesterday I built apache 2.0.44 and tomcat connector
mod_jk2 (tomcat 4.1.18) seems to compile fine with apache13,
but only "mod_jk2.so" is generated. There is no "libjkjni.so".
Is that a problem? Is "libjkjni.so" really needed? The mod_jk2
works fine without it in my test.
BTW, what is this "jni" thing in the jk2 connector? I understand
we already h
15 matches
Mail list logo
