But is this a "problem"? I'm using Linux, and I don't have such
'problems'. Although
it would be nice to have this options in server.xml file anyway. (rules
of generating classes)
- John.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 2/12/01, 9:44:47 AM, "Alex Fernández" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: *** Generated Tomcat Temporary Class File Name SeemTooLong.. . Yes ***:
> Sure! And when you're fixed the problem, please take the time to send it
to the Tomcat-dev list as a patch. (Just send the diff file and a [PATCH]
message, see http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html for details.) That
way everyone benefits from your bug-crashing, we'll admire you, and you'll
see the problem fixed in subsequent releases :)
> Cheers,
> Alex.
> John Golubenko wrote:
> > Sorry, but that moron pisses me off. I'm not saying that I know
everything.
> > The only thing I was trying to say, is that it's possible to modify
source
> > of tomcat, so fix the naming problem.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Fernández [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 9:10 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: *** Generated Tomcat Temporary Class File Name SeemTooLong.
> > .. Yes ***
> >
> > John, don't get jumpy. This is not one of your flame wars.
> >
> > GNU's Not Unix. Apache's not GNU. The Apache Group is not GNU. And the
GPL
> > (Gnu Public License) is not the Apache License.
> >
> > I was just trying to educate you: not all free software is GNU. There are
> > several public licenses available around, and the Apache License is one
of
> > the less restrictive ones -- while the GPL explicitly prohibits several
> > uses. I don't have anything against the GPL, and in fact like the FSF and
> > their work; but Tomcat belongs to the Apache Group.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> > John Golubenko wrote:
> >
> > > Don't worry, I've read it. Here is the copy for you, if you didn't.
> > > There is clearly written that you can modify the source code, and
> > > redistribute or use it. Just like I said in previus email, that it's
> > > legal to modify the source code, (file name generation) and compile it
> > back.
> > > While it's still true, i don't know what are you trying to prove. And
> > > who said that I'm not commercial developer? Sorry, you wrong.
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential or other privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have
received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit,
disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the
sender that you have received this email in error, and delete the copy you
received. Any communication that does not relate to official Columbia
business is that of the sender and is neither given nor endorsed by Columbia.
Thank you.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential or other privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this
communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or
otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have
received this email in error, and delete the copy you received. Any communication
that does not relate to official Columbia business is that of the sender and is
neither given nor endorsed by Columbia. Thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
