AW: Security - Attack

2002-06-13 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
I have doubts that the viruses will follow the redirect. I prefer to to answer with a 400/403/406 (still will be logged) or 204 (No log entry). I also have doubts that this is legal, so be carefull what you do. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Cato, Christopher [mailto:[EMAIL

AW: Security - Attack

2002-06-13 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
On which level did you implement this ? - apache/iis configuration - tomcat configuration - tomcat filter/valve Or where else ? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jean Christophe Rousseau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 14:21 An: Tomcat Users List

AW: Security - Attack

2002-06-13 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
Blocking the IP can be a dangerous thing: - If there are several people behind a proxy, you will disable all. - If the attacking pc has a provider wih dynamic IP's it dousn't help at all, it will just diable all user users that get this IP in the future. - It makes you vulnerable to dos

Re: AW: Security - Attack

2002-06-13 Thread peter lin
it's my home system, so I don't care if some one I don't know gets blocked. For production system it would be better to just filter as some one else said earlier. I run both tomcat and orion, so neither are vulnerable, but I rather not clean up logs every week because of stupid IIS exploits.

AW: Security - Attack

2002-06-13 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
I wouldn't say that they do no harm: - They mess up your statistics If you don't change your configuration it's not possible to distinguish the 404 from the viruses from others that might indicated errors in your site. (I always get nervous if a server has a 'file not found' count 0)