On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Diego.Tomcat wrote:
> I have not understand how I can use XML format instead of classic JSP
> format.
> I write a JSP page in XML format and then ...?
>
Then the JSP page compiler treats it just like any other JSP page
(recompiles it when changes occur, and so on). You d
... use Cocoon or write your oun servlet to provide XSLT for XML->HTML
transformation.
Regards,
Andrey
> -Original Message-
> From: Diego.Tomcat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JSP in XML forma
I have not understand how I can use XML format instead of classic JSP
format.
I write a JSP page in XML format and then ...?
Please help me!
Pierre Delisle wrote:
>
> As "Bap" replied, you must make sure you "escape" content that can be
> interpreted by XML. Remember, this is an XML document that is being
> submitted to an XML parser.
>
> By doing this:
>
>
>
>
>
> It should work fine.
>
> > When you asked me to report bugs I
Anne and Bill Moore wrote:
> ...
> I have now found a bug with scriplets.
> The < character in a scriptlet are being parsed as if it were markup
> rather than being treated as Java syntax less than symbol.
>
> For example the scriptlet
>
> <%
> for(int i=0; i<6; i++)
>out.
Bap wrote:
> "Michael G. Anderson C.T.O" wrote:
>
> > This, is a very excellent post!
> >
> > Anne and Bill Moore wrote:
> >
> > > Pierre Delisle wrote:
> > > I have now found a bug with scriplets.
> > > The < character in a scriptlet are being parsed as if it were markup
> > > rather than being
"Michael G. Anderson C.T.O" wrote:
> This, is a very excellent post!
>
> Anne and Bill Moore wrote:
>
> > Pierre Delisle wrote:
> > I have now found a bug with scriplets.
> > The < character in a scriptlet are being parsed as if it were markup
> > rather than being treated as Java syntax less th
Anne and Bill Moore wrote:
>
> BTW Bugrat seemed to mangle the example scriptlet I entered in the
> problem description and seems to have lost the comment I put in the How
> to reproduce section.
>
BugRat is simply embedding what you type into the HTML page it creates. I have
found it easiest t
This, is a very excellent post!
Anne and Bill Moore wrote:
> Pierre Delisle wrote:
> >
> > is currently not supported in tomcat-4.0.
> > You can either put the template data directly in the
> > jsp page, or you can simply use the standard XML tag
> > for CDATA: .
> >
> > Give it a try and let m
Pierre Delisle wrote:
>
> is currently not supported in tomcat-4.0.
> You can either put the template data directly in the
> jsp page, or you can simply use the standard XML tag
> for CDATA: .
>
> Give it a try and let me know.
>
> Please report any JSP page in XML syntax that does not
> work
--Original Message-
> From: Anne and Bill Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 10:05 AM
> To: tomcat user
> Subject: More on JSP in XML format
>
> I anm still trying to get my head around JSP in XML format.
> Can anyone suggest further readin
e
the proper fixes are committed.
-- Pierre
Anne and Bill Moore wrote:
>
> I anm still trying to get my head around JSP in XML format.
> Can anyone suggest further reading beyond the JSP Version 1.2 - Proposed
> Final Draft (PFD) spec or provide examples.
> When I try the examples
05 AM
To: tomcat user
Subject: More on JSP in XML format
I anm still trying to get my head around JSP in XML format.
Can anyone suggest further reading beyond the JSP Version 1.2 - Proposed
Final Draft (PFD) spec or provide examples.
When I try the examples like those from the spec using Tomcat Ve
I anm still trying to get my head around JSP in XML format.
Can anyone suggest further reading beyond the JSP Version 1.2 - Proposed
Final Draft (PFD) spec or provide examples.
When I try the examples like those from the spec using Tomcat Version
4.0 Milestone 4, I routinely get a
14 matches
Mail list logo
