Re: Performance proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk when TOMCAT integration with Apache

2005-08-16 Thread Xuekun Hu
proxy_ajp is mod_jk successor in Apache2.1/2.2 core. You can find more info: http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/mod/mod_proxy.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/mod/mod_proxy_ajp.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html Thx, Xuekun On 8/17/05, Christine Ho <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Performance proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk when TOMCAT integration with Apache

2005-08-16 Thread Christine Ho
Hi, Can somebody tell me what the difference between the proxy_ajp and mod_jk is. thanks, Christine --- Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xuekun Hu wrote: > > Hi, > >>From performance point, which connector will be > used for TOMCAT > > intergration with Apache? proxy_ajp or mod_jk?

Re: Performance proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk when TOMCAT integration with Apache

2005-08-15 Thread Mladen Turk
Xuekun Hu wrote: Hi, From performance point, which connector will be used for TOMCAT intergration with Apache? proxy_ajp or mod_jk? I read some docs which said mod_jk should have better performance than proxying. While proxy_ajp in Apache2.1 is an addition to the mod_proxy and uses Tomcat's AJ

Performance proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk when TOMCAT integration with Apache

2005-08-15 Thread Xuekun Hu
Hi, >From performance point, which connector will be used for TOMCAT intergration with Apache? proxy_ajp or mod_jk? I read some docs which said mod_jk should have better performance than proxying. While proxy_ajp in Apache2.1 is an addition to the mod_proxy and uses Tomcat's AJP protocol stack. S