RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-09-10 Thread Cox, Charlie
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader > > > Hi Charlie, > > thanks for your mail. After some heavy thinking (gee, this > topic lasted > longer than expected! :-) ), we came to the following conclusion: > > We will copy the HashTabl

Re: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-09-06 Thread Rodrigo Ruiz
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:15 AM Subject: RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader > Hi Charlie, > > thanks for your mail. After some heavy thinking (gee, this topic lasted > longer than expected! :-) ), we came to the

RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-09-05 Thread Juergen . Praska
discussion. Thanks a lot for the discussion we had. I enjoyed it very much! Jürgen > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RE: RE: Problems with class

RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-09-05 Thread Cox, Charlie
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader > > > Hi Charlie, > > You are right saying that it is a con

RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-09-05 Thread Juergen . Praska
.. :-( Jürgen -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:24:14 -0400 Subject: RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader I guess I wouldn't consider it a bug, but rather a consequence of how cl

RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-08-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Cox, Charlie wrote: > Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:24:14 -0400 > From: "Cox, Charlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: RE:

RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-08-30 Thread Cox, Charlie
hursday, August 29, 2002 11:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader > > > Hi Charlie, > > I gave it a try. And guess what: it worked! Now, in this > very simple case > one can argue that adding the collection classes to the > ap

RE: RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-08-29 Thread Juergen . Praska
ssloader. Of course being a java class, I'm not sure if it will have problems being(or can be) loaded multiple times. Charlie > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-08-09 Thread Cox, Charlie
7 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RE: Problems with class loader > > > see intermixed, too > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 08:42:05 -0400 > Subject: RE: Problems with class loader > > see intermixed > >

RE: RE: Problems with class loader

2002-08-09 Thread Juergen . Praska
see intermixed, too From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 08:42:05 -0400 Subject: RE: Problems with class loader see intermixed > > Hello, > > we have problems with the tomcat class loaders. > > scenario: > Tomcat 4.0.4, jdk1.3 > 2 Appli

RE: Problems with class loader

2002-08-09 Thread Cox, Charlie
see intermixed > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Problems with class loader > > > Hello, > > we have problems with the tomcat class loaders.

Problems with class loader

2002-08-09 Thread Juergen . Praska
Hello, we have problems with the tomcat class loaders. scenario: Tomcat 4.0.4, jdk1.3 2 Applications App1:webapps/App1/WEB-INF/lib/x.jar App2:webapps/App2/WEB-INF/lib/x.jar (the same .jar-file) x.jar: a.class, b.class, c.class b.class has a Hashtable (com.sun.java.util.collections.Hashtable)