Hi,
> From: Jonathan Eric Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:27 AM
>
> I'm curious to know if there are a lot of people out there
> running Tomcat in
> standalone mode versus using it with Apache Web Server or some other Web
> server?
>
> Previously, I've been usi
I have been running Tomcat 3.2.x standalone on Windows NT for about six
months and have never had a problem. Our applications are totally
dynamic except for a few image files, so I don't think Apache would
help.
As far as reliability goes, at least on NT, it seems that using both
Apache and Tomc
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Rob S. wrote:
>>> files. For personal sites, I would run standalone. It's less of a hassle
>>> to configure and maintain.
>>
>> and run tomcat as root or run a squid
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> With Tomcat 4 you won't have to run as root to use port 80. Thus the only
> technical reason (leaving aside performance for the moment) is if your
> application requires other functionality that is built in to Apache but
> not Tomcat).
ok - if th
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Rob S. wrote:
> > files. For personal sites, I would run standalone. It's less of a hassle
> > to configure and maintain.
>
> and run tomcat as root or run a squid accelerator?
>
>
>
With Tomcat 4 you won't have to run as
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Rob S. wrote:
> files. For personal sites, I would run standalone. It's less of a hassle
> to configure and maintain.
and run tomcat as root or run a squid accelerator?
> I'm curious to know if there are a lot of people out there
> running Tomcat in
> standalone mode versus using it with Apache Web Server or some other Web
> server?
If every single page in your site is a JSP, I've always thought that you
would have diminished performance if you added Apache? So
