RE: Java version

2002-10-22 Thread WATKIN-JONES,ADAM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1)
Try the archive at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html :) -Original Message- From: Altug B. Altintas Sent: 22 October 2002 14:30 Hi, I need j2sdk-1_3_1_03-windows-i586.exe because of nohup bug, formally i need java1.3.1_01, java1.3.1_02 or java1.3.1_03 for windows.. I co

RE: Java version

2002-10-22 Thread Javier Rodriguez
Try this: http://java.sun.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=7083 But this is only the JRE 1.3.1_05... -Mensaje original- De: Altug B. Altintas [mailto:altuga@;riskturk.com] Enviado el: martes, 22 de octubre de 2002 15:30 Para: Tomcat Users List Asunto: Java version Hi, I need j2sdk-

Re: Java version

2002-10-22 Thread Jean-Francois Arcand
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/ -- Jeanfrancois Altug B. Altintas wrote: Hi, I need j2sdk-1_3_1_03-windows-i586.exe because of nohup bug, formally i need java1.3.1_01, java1.3.1_02 or java1.3.1_03 for windows.. I couldn't find these releases on java.sun.com, any one who know the exact URL of t

Re: Java version

2002-06-13 Thread kf platypus
I might be wrong but wouldn't you need at least a 1.2 jvm for the servlet/jsp architecture. I'm pretty sure others will agree. Give that a whirl. 1.3.1 is the latest fully supported JVM. >From: Matthew Oatham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'[EMAIL

RE: Java version

2002-06-13 Thread Matthew Oatham
Yea I've got 1.1.3 just read in RUNNING.txt that 1.2 at the least is required. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Heap, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 June 2002 14:30 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Java version do you mean jvm 1.1.3 or 1.3.1 ? if the f

RE: Java version

2002-06-13 Thread Heap, John
do you mean jvm 1.1.3 or 1.3.1 ? if the former I suspect thats the problem. John. -Original Message- From: Matthew Oatham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 June 2002 14:34 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Java version Hi, I've downloaded Tomcat 4.0.3 for Solaris 2.6 but not sure it