Benson wrote:
Yoav, in one posting, explained that the servlet spec is
written from a
point of view that only requires support for applications in
unexploded WAR files.
Does the spec explicitly state that point of view? I can't find that
anywhere in the spec doc. Therefore this makes me
The standard make a series of provisions for the case in which there is
no 'pathname' corresponding to some resource in a web application. These
provisions were intended to support a model where a WAR file is never
exploded into a native file system. Conceptually, you can model this as
supporting
Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Re[2]: JNDI DataSource GlobalResources problem
The standard make a series of provisions for the case in which there is
no 'pathname' corresponding to some
As I read the discussion, I don't think that anyone claimed that only
WAR's are interesting or important.
Yoav, in one posting, explained that the servlet spec is written from a
point of view that only requires support for applications in unexploded
WAR files. That is not the same thing as
