Those are both very good points I hadn't considered - thank you!
:)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SEO and servlets
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Cox, Charlie
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Cox, Charlie wrote:
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:13:20 -0500
> From: "Cox, Charlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: SE
.
Charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 3:49 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: SEO and servlets
>
>
> Craig,
>
> Thanks for the reponse. I know what you're saying that you
>
that might be a way
around it ... but I'm beginning to think perhaps not. :(
Anyway, thanks for your thoughts.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SEO and servlets
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, neal wrote:
> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:06:53 -0800
> From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: SEO and servlets
>
> I was reading on Google the other day that it supports "many of t
