Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-03 Thread Peter Lin
having used SunOne in the past, I would agree 2-5x faster is not likely or even possible. SunOne is a combination of the old Netscape code, jvm and the reference implementation of the servlet spec. In practice, it is no different than servlet containers that use native library for handling socket

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-02 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
Jérôme Duval wrote: Why would you compare Apache and Tomcat vs. SunONE? Isn't there a lot of overhead in using the connector and all that? Seems to me a more logical test would be Tomcat vs SunONE and the most recent version of both, which Tomcat 4.1.30 is not. I smell bogus test results! When I se

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-02 Thread Vic Cekvenich
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/04/10/java_servlet_engines.html Above is Sun's market share of production sites. So... .V On Friday 30 July 2004 05:40 pm, David Wall wrote: It is worth noting that Sun Java Web Server has better performance than Apache Tomcat; you can learn more about this

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-02 Thread Robert Bateman
I've just finished reading the report and can find no where in the report that Tomcat failed It *does* indicate that the combination of Apache httpd and Apache Tomcat had problems - but the report does not indicate, as far as I can tell, which component reported the failure. Without knowin

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-02 Thread Vy Ho
ested them myself. Cheers! -Original Message- From: Vy Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance I am sorry for not being clear enough. The test did not run with both Apache and Tomcat, only Tomcat 5.0. Pl

RE: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-02 Thread Jérôme Duval
ECTED] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance I am sorry for not being clear enough. The test did not run with both Apache and Tomcat, only Tomcat 5.0. Please understand that I do not try to create a flame war here. This is on

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-02 Thread Vy Ho
d the most recent version of both, which Tomcat 4.1.30 is not. I smell bogus test results! -Original Message- From: V D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 11:24 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance I used it for webservice before, and

RE: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-08-02 Thread Jérôme Duval
ssage- From: V D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 11:24 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance I used it for webservice before, and it is faster than Tomcat, but I wouldn't say that was 2 to 5 times for that particular case. You can get i

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-07-31 Thread V D
I used it for webservice before, and it is faster than Tomcat, but I wouldn't say that was 2 to 5 times for that particular case. You can get it for free because it's bundled with the Application Server platform which is free. Julian wrote: Just downloaded it to give it a try. There's a trial

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-07-30 Thread Julian
Just downloaded it to give it a try. There's a trial version but nevertheless it costs only $75. David Rees wrote: David Wall wrote: It is worth noting that Sun Java Web Server has better performance than Apache Tomcat; you can learn more about this from Sun Java Web Server vs. Apache/Tomcat Ben

Re: SunONE versus Tomcat performance

2004-07-30 Thread David Rees
David Wall wrote: > > It is worth noting that Sun Java Web Server has better performance than > Apache Tomcat; you can learn more about this from Sun Java Web Server vs. > Apache/Tomcat Benchmarks. > > The link to the KeyLabs report is at > http://www.keylabs.com/results/sun/SunONEFinalReport_Sola