Re: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and apache 1.3

2003-10-08 Thread Don Heitzmann
Mark, boy can I identify with your first sentenceI'm in the same boat, and I too am going insane. (Maybe we can meet when we both get there :-) ) The best resource I've found (which I didn't find until a serendipitous google probe after about 4 days of suffering) is at www.johnturner.com

RE: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and apache 1.3

2003-10-09 Thread Curley, Thomas
Fully agree - the connector tomcat/apache doc is a mess - can't understand why the connector developers cannot write a simple doc as part of release procedure or ask for help in documenting this. I'm alo trying to integrate Apache 1.3, TC 4.1.27 using jk2 on RH7.3 >From what I see you need mod_

RE: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and apache 1.3

2003-10-09 Thread Mark Claassen
ctober 09, 2003 3:39 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and apache 1.3 > > > Fully agree - the connector tomcat/apache doc is a mess - > can't understand why the connector developers cannot write a > simple doc as part of release procedure or

RE: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and apache 1.3

2003-10-10 Thread Mark Claassen
1 0 (error) [mod_jk2.c (427)]: mod_jk.handler() Error connecting to tomcat 21000 Mark > -Original Message- > From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:06 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and ap

RE: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and apache 1.3

2003-10-10 Thread Mark Claassen
1 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: Tomcat4.1, jk2, and apache 1.3 > > > Well, I figured out how to get jk2 and apache 1.3 > working...sort of. Now I am getting this error. I have seen > lots of others ask about this, but no real answers. Does > anyo