Re: bad time with tomcat

2000-10-27 Thread John Ellis
Another eas way to track down a System.exit() is to replace the System class in rt.jar with one that you modify from the source. Add a Thread.dumpStack() to the the call. This will let you know where the problem is in the event that it is in a third party library that you don't have access to th

RE: bad time with tomcat

2000-10-27 Thread John Bateman
Hi I've also had issues with Tomcat, but maybe along different lines. I'm using a P2-400mhz with 256 meg Ram Linux (6.2) box running Tomcat as Stand alone. I use JMeter to pound the heck out of some servlets on the machine like SnoopServlet, Cookie25 and a couple of other basic servlets. The mo

RE: bad time with tomcat

2000-10-27 Thread Andy LaMora
Do you think you could be having garbage collection issues? Are you specifically releasing references? -Original Message- From: Craig Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 21:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bad time with tomcat Hi All,

Re: bad time with tomcat

2000-10-27 Thread Drasko Kokic
Well, probably not big help to you, but I can report my first production site running Tomcat 3.1 on Solaris 2.7 and jdk1.2 with quite a bit of load (Cocoon 1.7.4 servlet and some custom Java classes) My machine is 1GB RAM Netra T1 machine. --- Craig Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, >

RE: bad time with tomcat

2000-10-26 Thread Charles Beckham
: Re: bad time with tomcat > At this point, tomcat is the least stable component in our > environment. Tomcats are usually pretty unstable until you get them fixed. (sorry, couldn't help myself) > Tomcat will die on us regularly without giving any > hint as to why, If you&

Re: bad time with tomcat

2000-10-26 Thread Joe Emenaker
> At this point, tomcat is the least stable component in our > environment. Tomcats are usually pretty unstable until you get them fixed. (sorry, couldn't help myself) > Tomcat will die on us regularly without giving any > hint as to why, If you're not getting an exception, then I'd suspect