RE: bug in java api? (ot)

2003-02-06 Thread Daniel Brown
But 2000 *was* a leap year...? http://world.std.com/~dpbsmith/leapyearfaq.txt > -Original Message- > From: Felipe Schnack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 February 2003 11:50 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: bug in java api? (ot) > > > Take a look at the following code > > Gregor

RE: bug in java api? (ot)

2003-02-06 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
In gregorian calendar aplies following rule isLeapYear = (year mod 4 = 0) and ((not year mod 100 = 0) or (year mod 400 = 0)) 2000 mod 4 = 0 -> true not 2000 mod 100 = 0 -> false 2000 mod 400 = 0 -> true true and (false or true) -> true > -Original Message- > From: Felipe Schnack [mail

RE: bug in java api? (ot)

2003-02-06 Thread mech
rrect... > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2003 13:03 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: bug in java api? (ot) > > > But 2000 *was* a leap year...? > > http://world.std.com/~dpbsmith/leapyearf

Re: bug in java api? (ot)

2003-02-06 Thread Tim Funk
Check your calendar first ... http://www.earth.com/calendar?2%2F2000 And a FAQ (thanks google!): http://world.std.com/~dpbsmith/leapyearfaq.txt Y2K was a leap year. -Tim Felipe Schnack wrote: Take a look at the following code GregorianCalendar cal = (GregorianCalendar)Calendar.getInstance()