Re: client authorization.

2002-07-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Anthony Geoghegan wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:18:33 +0100 From: Anthony Geoghegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: client authorization. Is it possible to use client certificate

RE: client authorization.

2002-07-17 Thread Tathagat (London)
PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 16:59 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: client authorization. On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Anthony Geoghegan wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:18:33 +0100 From: Anthony Geoghegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users

RE: client authorization.

2002-07-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Tathagat (London) wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:03:30 +0100 From: Tathagat (London) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: client authorization. They only describe how to get

Re: client authorization.

2002-07-17 Thread Anthony Geoghegan
Subject: RE: client authorization. On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Tathagat (London) wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:03:30 +0100 From: Tathagat (London) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: client authorization

Re: client authorization.

2002-07-17 Thread David Mossakowski
: RE: client authorization. On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Tathagat (London) wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:03:30 +0100 From: Tathagat (London) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: client authorization. They only