Re: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jim Michael wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:52:37 -0500 > From: Jim Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: flush="false" not working? > > > >Or

Re: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-13 Thread Jim Michael
>Or setting your headers in the outer page, which is where it should be >done IMHO. Includes are for content only -- trying to mix in control-type >functionality like modifying headers is a poor design practice. That makes some dynamic sites very problematic... image that every page on a site i

Re: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jim Michael wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:36:38 -0500 > From: Jim Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: flush="false" not working? > > >What w

Re: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-13 Thread Jim Michael
>What would you propose a servlet container do when a page has three >different includes, each of which wants to set the same header to some >different value? Remember that, as far as the client is concerned, this >is a single request, so there is no such thing as a "last modified" >timestamp for

Re: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Jim Michael wrote: > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:14:05 -0500 > From: Jim Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: flush="false" not working? > > Thanks..

Re: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-12 Thread Jim Michael
Thanks... that totally sucks! I found at least five web sites that claim the new 1.2 JSP spec allows a included servlet to modify header... of course, the actual spec from Sun says otherwise, as you point out. If an included servelt can't modify headers, what's the point of enabling flush=false

Re: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
The new flush="false" value does *not* change the restriction in the Servlet spec that included servlets are not allowed to affect headers in the response. Therefore, Tomcat will still ignore any attempt to set the "Last-Modified" header inside an included JSP. See the relevant Servlet 2.3 and

RE: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-12 Thread Charles Sanders
] Subject: RE: flush="false" not working? Sigh... that was just a typo when I entered the message... Trust that I *do* have flush="false" in the JSP correctly... >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/12/02 11:20AM >>> double check your spelling: in the example you pro

RE: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-12 Thread Jim Michael
Sigh... that was just a typo when I entered the message... Trust that I *do* have flush="false" in the JSP correctly... >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/12/02 11:20AM >>> double check your spelling: in the example you provided you spelled flush ("fluch="false") -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: flush="false" not working?

2002-06-12 Thread Charles Sanders
double check your spelling: in the example you provided you spelled flush ("fluch="false") -Original Message- From: Jim Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: flush="false" not working? I was under the impression that To