this is a known bug of JDK 1.3 on NT
On Monday, May 28, 2001 4:52 PM, Krishna Kishore Thotakura
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> hello,
> I am trying to setup multiple JVMs using mod_jk. the JVM running at port
8080
> is okay. I'm having problem with the JVM running at port 8090. whenever, i
lo
Hi,
thanks for your quick response.
But my server is a unix box running Red Hat 6.2.
"Pernica, Jan" wrote:
>
> this is a known bug of JDK 1.3 on NT
>
> On Monday, May 28, 2001 4:52 PM, Krishna Kishore Thotakura
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > hello,
> > I am trying to setup multiple
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Pernica, Jan wrote:
> this is a known bug of JDK 1.3 on NT
But from the command he shows as how he's starting tomcat, it looks
like he's on a UNIX machine.
I'd say that probably all he needs to do is start it in the
background, a la:
./startup.sh -f server_1.xml &
Might w
: RE: tomcat process dies out...
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Pernica, Jan wrote:
> this is a known bug of JDK 1.3 on NT
But from the command he shows as how he's starting tomcat, it looks
like he's on a UNIX machine.
I'd say that probably all he needs to do is start it i
perhaps if one is using ksh et al, one
needs to use nohup.
> -Original Message-
> From: Milt Epstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 May 2001 16:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: tomcat process dies out...
>
>
> On Mon, 28 May 2001, Pernica, Jan wrote:
e the case. So perhaps if one is using ksh et al, one
> needs to use nohup.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Milt Epstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 28 May 2001 16:22
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: tomcat process dies out...
> >
The commands can also look like:
Under /bin/sh, /bin/ksh, /bin/bash, etc:
nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml > /tmp/mytomcat.log 2>&1 &
Under /bin/csh or /bin/tcsh
nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml >&! &
Jan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Krishna Kishore Thotakura wrote:
> It
yeah..now, it works.
>nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml >&1 &
could u please explain how it made a difference?
What does redirection to '&1' mean? sorry, i am not a unix pro.
Jan Labanowski wrote:
>
> The commands can also look like:
>
> Under /bin/sh, /bin/ksh, /bin/bash, etc:
>
> nohup
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Jan Labanowski wrote:
> The commands can also look like:
>
> Under /bin/sh, /bin/ksh, /bin/bash, etc:
>
> nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml > /tmp/mytomcat.log 2>&1 &
>
> Under /bin/csh or /bin/tcsh
>
> nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml >&! &
Don't you need a file name
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Krishna Kishore Thotakura wrote:
> yeah..now, it works.
>
> >nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml >&1 &
>
> could u please explain how it made a difference?
> What does redirection to '&1' mean? sorry, i am not a unix pro.
Ummm, the command you show above doesn't match either
Hi,
yeah, i made a typo and
>nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml >&1 &
did work. I am using tcsh shell. I now understand that
>nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml
also works. But i think i should redirect stdout,stderr to some file coz i dont
see the stdout,stderr written to nohup.out as described
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Krishna Kishore Thotakura wrote:
> Hi,
> yeah, i made a typo and
> >nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml >&1 &
> did work. I am using tcsh shell. I now understand that
> >nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml
> also works. But i think i should redirect stdout,stderr to some file
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 May 2001 17:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tomcat process dies out...
Hi,
thanks for your quick response.
But my server is a unix box running Red Hat 6.2.
"Pernica, Jan" wrote:
>
> this is a known bug of JDK 1.3
> The commands can also look like:
>
> Under /bin/sh, /bin/ksh, /bin/bash, etc:
>
> nohup ./startup.sh -f server_1.xml > /tmp/mytomcat.log 2>&1 &
This means:
nohup -- do not kill process on terminal interrupt
> file -- redirect STDOUT to file
2>&1 -- join STDERR(2) with STDOUT (1)
&
14 matches
Mail list logo
