9, 2004 4:40 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: which to use: JK2 or JK?
>
>Ralph Einfeldt wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but I think you are wrong.
>>
>> There have been several post in the last days from the
>> developers, that clearly say, that there will be no fur
That's the official statement:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#2
0041115.1
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:40 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: which to use: JK2
Ralph Einfeldt wrote:
Sorry, but I think you are wrong.
There have been several post in the last days from the
developers, that clearly say, that there will be no further
development for mod_jk2.
This saddens me. I was under th impression that JK2 was more advanced.
What are the reasons for abando
webserver project.
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 7:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: which to use: JK2 or JK?
Erez Efrati wrote:
What do you mean by "no longer being supported"?
The current status is t
Erez Efrati wrote:
Hi,
I am installing an apache + JBoss/tomcat and I need to run the JK
module.
Now I understand that the JK2 is no longer supported so does it mean
that it would be better using JK1.2?
What do you mean by "no longer being supported"?
The current status is thet JK1 is considere
