Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-17 Thread John Turner
A Tomcat 404 generally means there is no Context configured in server.xml to match the request. In your case, it would typically mean that you're missing something like: Context path=/webapp docBase=webapp /Context John On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:57:16 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Ruchi Dayal
Try using the AJP13 connector in http.conf instead of the Coyote/AJP13 connector. Also, comment out tomcat-standalone. i.e. comment out where Coyote starts on port 80. Hope this helps. -Ruchi -Original Message- From: Bongrip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread John Turner
Did you configure mod_jk? JkMount, JkLogLevel, etc? - change JkLogLevel to info and post the results from mod_jk log file - post JkMount and the URL you are trying to use, as well as your Apache virtual host config John On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:50:57 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread John Turner
Tomcat never starts on port 80 by default. John On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:57:43 -0400, Ruchi Dayal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try using the AJP13 connector in http.conf instead of the Coyote/AJP13 connector. Also, comment out tomcat-standalone. i.e. comment out where Coyote starts on port 80. Hope

RE: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Ruchi Dayal
I apologize. It was a typo. -Ruchi -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:08 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working Tomcat never starts on port 80 by default. John On Wed, 16

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Simon Pabst
What does your mod_jk configuration in httpd.conf look like? Any errors in mod_jk.log? Does the 404 error come from tomcat or apache? At 12:50 16.07.2003 -0700, you wrote: I build an apache 1.3.27 server and mod_jk as a DSO and it loads correctly and is recognized by the apache server. The

RE: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Simon Pabst
I think mod_jk works both with Coyote and old AJP13 connector (did for me at least). The tomcat http port on 8080 shouldn't cause any trouble, besides it helps with testing - if the JSP Page is accessible over 8080 then Apache/mod_jk is the problem. At 15:57 16.07.2003 -0400, you wrote: Try

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Bongrip
John Turner wrote: Did you configure mod_jk? JkMount, JkLogLevel, etc? - change JkLogLevel to info and post the results from mod_jk log file - post JkMount and the URL you are trying to use, as well as your Apache virtual host config John On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:50:57 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Bongrip
Simon Pabst wrote: What does your mod_jk configuration in httpd.conf look like? Any errors in mod_jk.log? Does the 404 error come from tomcat or apache? At 12:50 16.07.2003 -0700, you wrote: I build an apache 1.3.27 server and mod_jk as a DSO and it loads correctly and is recognized by the

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread John Turner
This will go a lot faster if you please post your JK configuration. It could be as simple as you having the JkMount messed up, or it could be something else. John On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:24:01 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Turner wrote: Did you configure mod_jk? JkMount,

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Juan Nin
From: Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I try to access a jsp page it gives me error 404. But the file is there and is readable by all. (0644) I am running tomcat 4.1.24 and using Sun's j2sdk 1.4.1 rev 03. I get nothing logged to either the apache logs or the tomcat logs when I make a request.

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Bongrip
John Turner wrote: This will go a lot faster if you please post your JK configuration. It could be as simple as you having the JkMount messed up, or it could be something else. John On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:24:01 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Turner wrote: Did you configure

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Bongrip
Juan Nin wrote: From: Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I try to access a jsp page it gives me error 404. But the file is there and is readable by all. (0644) I am running tomcat 4.1.24 and using Sun's j2sdk 1.4.1 rev 03. I get nothing logged to either the apache logs or the tomcat logs when I make

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Simon Pabst
Since the 404 comes from Tomcat, Apache/mod_jk should be working. Can you call the jsp over Tomcat's HTTP Connector (port 8080)? like this http://localhost:8080/myapp/index.jsp instead of http://localhost/myapp/index.jsp Are there any errors in tomcat/logs/catalina.out or The 404 error comes

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Simon Pabst
Think John meant the Jk Configuration entries of your httpd.conf, not your worers.properties - i also asked for that in a previous post. If you want help, answer the questions :-) At 14:35 16.07.2003 -0700, you wrote: John Turner wrote: This will go a lot faster if you please post your JK

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Bongrip
Simon Pabst wrote: Since the 404 comes from Tomcat, Apache/mod_jk should be working. Can you call the jsp over Tomcat's HTTP Connector (port 8080)? like this http://localhost:8080/myapp/index.jsp instead of http://localhost/myapp/index.jsp Are there any errors in tomcat/logs/catalina.out or

Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working

2003-07-16 Thread Bongrip
Simon Pabst wrote: Think John meant the Jk Configuration entries of your httpd.conf, not your worers.properties - i also asked for that in a previous post. If you want help, answer the questions :-) At 14:35 16.07.2003 -0700, you wrote: John Turner wrote: This will go a lot faster if you