age-
> From: Barnabas Yohannes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat crashes simultaneous more connection above 990+
>
>
> Looks, like my webpage at tomcat is crashing because of many
> people
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat crashes simultaneous more connection above 990+
> Does anyone try to apply that theory on Tomcat or Jetty or JBoss?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Aravind Na
Does anyone try to apply that theory on Tomcat or Jetty or JBoss?
- Original Message -
From: "Aravind Naidu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: Tomcat crashes simultaneous more connection above 990+
&g
Volano (makers of Volano Chat) is a company that is naturally interested
in servers that support lots of simultaneous threads. For several years
they've been publishing their benchmark results on the abilities of
various OS+JVM combinations to scale up to thread counts in the thousands.
There a
Santosh Pasi at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for your reply. And good link, really useful.
>
> Here are results of our troubleshoot :(
> On PIII 600, 256 Mb RAM, IDE Harddisk, RedHat Linux -
> total no. of max. connection 990-1000 and finally tomcat crashes. But
> still apac
--
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:31:33 +1000
>From: Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Santosh Pasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Re: Tomcat crashes simultaneous more connection above 990+
>Mail-Followup-To: Santosh Pasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>
> It _can_ be done... Probably not in Java (I'm not that sure it can handle
> that many file descriptors open), but I've seen a Sun E4500 (fully
> populated) holding up 20k connections with 100 processes and 200 threads
> each... But it was a 1 million $$$ machine...
Jeff Turner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well I think you're completely nuts :) For 10,000 concurrent requests for
> *dynamic* data (or else you'd just be using Apache.. right?), you'd need a
> server farm full of fancy equipment, a load-balancing server, and stuff that
> even my wildly ignorant
Hi folks,
coincidentally I am also having problems with large number of concurrent
connections to Tomcat
getting errors when we try and connect many clients concurrently to Tomcat.
Does anyone have experience of this sort of Tomcat usage or should we be
looking at a different servlet container
Jeff Turner wrote:
>
> Well I think you're completely nuts :) For 10,000 concurrent requests for
> *dynamic* data (or else you'd just be using Apache.. right?), you'd need a
> server farm full of fancy equipment, a load-balancing server, and stuff that
> even my wildly ignorant speculations can't
Well I think you're completely nuts :) For 10,000 concurrent requests for
*dynamic* data (or else you'd just be using Apache.. right?), you'd need a
server farm full of fancy equipment, a load-balancing server, and stuff that
even my wildly ignorant speculations can't conceive.
Besides, I don't t
TECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Tomcat crashes simultaneous more connection above 990+
>Mail-Followup-To: Santosh Pasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
>
>On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:01:24AM +0530, San
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:01:24AM +0530, Santosh Pasi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Still not any reply
>
> Is there any tips for compiling tomcat for heavy load ?...
> After changing few settings .. i can reach upto 1800 simultaneous
> connections ... after that tomcat ... didn't send any reply(no mo
Hi,
Still not any reply
Is there any tips for compiling tomcat for heavy load ?...
After changing few settings .. i can reach upto 1800 simultaneous
connections ... after that tomcat ... didn't send any reply(no more crash)...
Regards,
Santosh Pasi
---Original Message---
14 matches
Mail list logo
