Hello Mark, Sorry, didn't get that email before I sent mine. Also, I don't use Solaris so I can't help you there.
Good luck! Jake Monday, June 24, 2002, 9:42:52 AM, you wrote: FM> Thanks, for your reply but I think I apologized already. Still I do agree FM> with what you say (for the most part). Also, I'm trying to build for FM> Solaris 8. Got a binary for that? I do, but mine doesn't seem to be FM> working. FM> Thanks, FM> -Mark FM> -----Original Message----- FM> From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] FM> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:39 AM FM> To: Tomcat Users List FM> Subject: Re[2]: MOD_JK Problem ? FM> Hello Mark, FM> A binary version of mod_jk for Windows that works with Apache 2.0.39 has FM> been made available at this FM> site: FM> http://www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk/ FM> Note that the only reason the old module didn't work with Apache 2.0.39 is FM> that something changed in Apache, not the Tomcat connectors. The connectors FM> just needed to be compiled against the newer version of Apache. FM> As much as you and I would like the Apache developers to produce binary FM> versions of the software they develop, it is not really their FM> responsibility. It is all of ours. If you believe differently, then you FM> misunderstand open source. I'm not so familiar with how to compile mod_jk, FM> but that is no reason to expect someone else to do it for me. Luckily, FM> people from the open source community pitch in and help each other out. FM> That is what the person at the site mentioned above has done. He's given FM> his time to help out others. This help should not be taken for granted. FM> Your business is not Apache Software's responsibility. They provide the FM> tools. You need to be resourceful, or know someone who is resourceful, FM> enough to use them. And keep in mind that Open source is not free as in FM> "free beer", it is free as in "freedom of thought and expression". If you FM> don't want to use it, that is up to you, but the source is available for you FM> to use as freely as you like. However, no one owes you anything. Keep that FM> in mind at all times. FM> Jake FM> Monday, June 24, 2002, 7:09:51 AM, you wrote: FM>> Nothing but agreement here, today will be the 5th business day that FM>> I will spend trying to figure out why Apache 2 and Tomcat 4 will not FM>> work together. I should be able to download them configure them and FM>> just go. Everyone says use Apache/Tomcat it's free, what they don't FM>> say is it's free for a reason. FM>> -Thanks, FM>> Mark FM>> -----Original Message----- FM>> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] FM>> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:47 AM FM>> To: 'Tomcat Users List' FM>> Subject: RE: MOD_JK Problem ? FM>> Well said, and I agree 100%. I spent 8 business days trying to get FM> Apache 2 FM>> with Tomcat 4 working, both with mod_webapp and mod_jk, before giving up FM> and FM>> going back to Apache 1.3. Granted, I am not experienced with tomcat, FM> which FM>> may account for some of the delay, but your comments are right on the FM> money. FM>> All due respect to the developers, but the idea that Apache 2, Tomcat 4, FM> and FM>> the connectors are all separate projects, with little or no coordination FM> (as FM>> far as I can tell) is really disappointing. To me, that seems like a FM> big FM>> mistake. FM>> John Turner FM>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] FM>> -----Original Message----- FM>> From: Andy Eastham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] FM>> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 6:26 PM FM>> To: Tomcat Users List FM>> Subject: RE: MOD_JK Problem ? FM>> I think everyone who uses Tomcat should back off using Apache2 until all FM> the FM>> connectors and more so the documentation get beyond pre-alpha state. FM>> I'm a big fan of Apache and Tomcat, but I'm afraid the current state of FM> the FM>> connectors SUCKS. FM>> I've held my tongue from writing this email for over a month, but now I FM>> can't help it. I've wasted days trying to get this working myself, and FM> I've FM>> downgraded back to apache 1 again... FM>> Given that Apache Tomcat is the reference Servlet Implementation, I FM> think FM>> that something needs to be done soon. You basically can't use it with FM> the FM>> world's most popular web server. It seems to me that there is very FM> little FM>> co-ordination between the separate Apache, Tomcat and Apache-Tomcat FM>> connectors projects. Just take a look under FM>> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ - apart from FM>> coyote, there is rather a sad dearth of content. FM>> I'm very sorry to have written this message which I'm sure will offend FM> some FM>> very hard working people. I don't want to offend anyone, but I think FM>> someone needs to say this. The Apache organisation has set and achieved FM>> some very high standards, and this area is significantly below par. FM>> Sorry. FM>> Andy >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jerry Jalenak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Sent: 21 June 2002 14:03 >>> To: 'Tomcat Users List' >>> Subject: RE: MOD_JK Problem ? >>> >>> >>> Sounds like I need to back off from 4.1.3beta and go back to the last >>> 4.0.x build. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Jerry Jalenak >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:58 AM >>> To: 'Tomcat Users List' >>> Subject: RE: MOD_JK Problem ? >>> >>> >>> >>> According to this thread, there seems to be a problem with mod_jk and >>> the latest apache (2.0.39): >>> >>> http://mailman.real-time.com/pipermail/tomcat-users/2002-June/069534.h >>> tml >>> >>> John Turner >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://www.aas.com >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jerry Jalenak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 7:50 PM >>> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>> Subject: MOD_JK Problem ? >>> >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I've been trying to get the following configuration to work. >>> >>> Windows NT >>> Apache 2.0.39 >>> Tomcat 4.1.3 beta >>> >>> Separately, I can see the Apache default 'Welcome' by going to >>> http://localhost; in a similar vein I can see Tomcat's default >>> 'Welcome' by going to http://localhost:8080/index.jsp. What I can't >>> make work is seeing >>> Tomcat's 'Welcome' page by going to http://localhost/index.jsp >>> (or any other >>> path for that matter!). I've rebuilt the connectors for Tomcat, download >>> the mod_jk.dll from www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk, and set up my >>> workers.properties >>> and mod_jk.conf files (similar to what I used under Tomcat 3.3.1 >>> - maybe the >>> problem?) Does anyone have any ideas why I can't see my JSP pages FM> without >>> needing to specify the port? >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Jerry >>> >>> This transmission (and any information attached to it) may be >>> confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or >>> entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient >>> or the person responsible for delivering the transmission to the >>> intended recipient, be advised that you have received this >>> transmission in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, >>> printing, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If >>> you have received this transmission in error, please >>> immediately notify LabOne at (800)388-4675. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> FM>> -- FM>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: FM> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FM>> For additional commands, e-mail: FM>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FM>> -- FM>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: FM> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FM>> For additional commands, e-mail: FM> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Best regards, Jacob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>