RE: Subclassing the Session object

On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Nick Sharples wrote: > Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:45:32 +0100 > From: Nick Sharples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject

RE: Subclassing the Session object

Milt Epstein writes: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Nick Sharples wrote: > > > > > Shapira, Yoav writes: > > > Hi, > > > I don't know the direct answer to your question. > > > > > > But I'm curious as to the use-case that's requiring you to subclass > > > HttpSession. As opposed to, for ex

RE: Subclassing the Session object

--Original Message- >From: Nick Sharples [mailto:nick@;runtime-collective.com] >Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:50 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Subclassing the Session object > > >Hi, > >I'd like to subclass the Session object and I thought there was a >c

RE: Subclassing the Session object

Shapira, Yoav writes: > Hi, > I don't know the direct answer to your question. > > But I'm curious as to the use-case that's requiring you to subclass > HttpSession. As opposed to, for example, binding your (Serializable) > objects to the session? Thanks, We have a clustered environment

Subclassing the Session object

Hi, I'd like to subclass the Session object and I thought there was a configuration option somewhere to allow for this. Does anyone know how to configure which class is used for the Session? Cheers ..Nick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For add

RE: Subclassing the Session object

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Nick Sharples wrote: > > Shapira, Yoav writes: > > Hi, > > I don't know the direct answer to your question. > > > > But I'm curious as to the use-case that's requiring you to subclass > > HttpSession. As opposed to, for example, binding your (Serializable) > > objects t