Re: Tomcat 3.2.1/Mime type ignored

2001-01-11 Thread Robert Wohleb
e correct mime > type. > > /sanjay > > -Original Message- > From: William Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.2.1/Mime type ignored > > Sanjay Madhavan wrote: > > > &g

RE: Tomcat 3.2.1/Mime type ignored

2001-01-10 Thread Sanjay Madhavan
then they are treated as the correct mime type. /sanjay -Original Message- From: William Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.2.1/Mime type ignored Sanjay Madhavan wrote: > > I am unable to get

Re: Tomcat 3.2.1/Mime type ignored

2001-01-10 Thread William Brogden
Sanjay Madhavan wrote: > > I am unable to get Tomcat 3.2.1 to recognise any new mime types that I enter > into the conf/web.xml file. > > Tomcat seems to ignore these new mime types and returns the document as a > text/plain document. As I understand it, 3.2 does indeed ignore /conf/web.xml e

Tomcat 3.2.1/Mime type ignored

2001-01-10 Thread Sanjay Madhavan
I am unable to get Tomcat 3.2.1 to recognise any new mime types that I enter into the conf/web.xml file. Tomcat seems to ignore these new mime types and returns the document as a text/plain document. I have looked at the FAQ and there is already a query from a user stating that he has the same p