Re: Re[2]: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-07-01 Thread Luminous Heart
gt; > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Brian Millett wrote: > >> > >> > Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 07:13:09 -0500 > >> > From: Brian Millett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List > >> &l

Re[2]: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-07-01 Thread Jacob Kjome
t; > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: Tomcat Users List >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Subject: Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + >> mod_jk2.so >> > >> > On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:41, Luminous Heart wrote: >

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-07-01 Thread Luminous Heart
e: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 07:13:09 -0500 > > From: Brian Millett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Tomcat Users List > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + > mod_jk2.so > >

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-07-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Brian Millett wrote: > Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 07:13:09 -0500 > From: Brian Millett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x +

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-07-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Luminous Heart wrote: > Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 18:41:00 -0700 (PDT) > From: Luminous Heart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: apache2.0.39 + tomc

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-07-01 Thread Brian Millett
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:41, Luminous Heart wrote: > It seems that tomcat4.1.6 and tomcat4.1.3 (for this > matter) do not like jdk1.4! I get errors about not > being able to compile jsp files. If I switch Java_Home > to jdk1.2 it compiles fine. But of course 1.2 does not > support some of the new

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-06-30 Thread Jacob Kjome
That error happens when you define the following for JMX beans support: in server.xml. and you don't define the Coyote ajp1.3 connector If you use the older ajp1.3 connector, comment the above listeners out. Jake At 04:43 PM 6/30/2002 -0700, you wrote: >I am doing similar to what you

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-06-30 Thread Luminous Heart
It seems that tomcat4.1.6 and tomcat4.1.3 (for this matter) do not like jdk1.4! I get errors about not being able to compile jsp files. If I switch Java_Home to jdk1.2 it compiles fine. But of course 1.2 does not support some of the new features in tomcat like keepSocketAlive. I guess I should st

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-06-30 Thread Luminous Heart
I am doing similar to what you have here. When I start my tomcat I get this error in my catalina.out INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8003 ServerLifecycleListener: createMBeans: MBeanException java.lang.Exception: ManagedBean is not found with Ajp13Connector at org.apache.catalina.mb

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-06-30 Thread Liam Morley
Brian, then it seems you're running jk1, not jk2 then, the same connector as in previous versions of tomcat. Liam Morley Brian Millett wrote: >On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 17:11, Luminous Heart wrote: > > >>Do I understand that mod_jk version 1 works with >>tomcat4.1 and apache2.0.x? >> >> > >

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-06-30 Thread Brian Millett
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 17:11, Luminous Heart wrote: > Do I understand that mod_jk version 1 works with > tomcat4.1 and apache2.0.x? Here is my "stuff" for tomcat 4.1.6, apache 2.0.39, redhat 7.2 server.xml: (comment out the jk2 stuff) Then in the apache httpd.con

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-06-30 Thread Luminous Heart
Do I understand that mod_jk version 1 works with tomcat4.1 and apache2.0.x? I somehow understood from the configuration files, that look for mod_jk2.so that you can not use but jk2. If my understanding is wrong please let me know, and if you got any config tips on that. Thanks. --- Liam Morley <

Re: apache2.0.39 + tomcat4.1.x + mod_jk2.so

2002-06-29 Thread Liam Morley
I've temporarily given up on trying to configure mod_jk2 as my last post on the issue came up without a response. (I'm secretly hoping that the person developing jk2 is listening and is currently looking through the logs I posted seeing if anything looks familiar.. other than that, I'm stickin