, 2002 2:46 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: localhost vs IP address in the URL
I'm not a networking guru, (and this is sort of OT for
Tomcat) but I'm not
convinced by M.Schwartz's response that this is due solely
to DNS name
resolution. I don't think that would account
I'm not a networking guru, (and this is sort of OT for
Tomcat) but I'm not
convinced by M.Schwartz's response that this is due solely to DNS name
resolution. I don't think that would account for such a big
difference in
time--once the name was resolved to the IP address, behavior
I'm not a networking guru, (and this is sort of OT for Tomcat) but I'm not
convinced by M.Schwartz's response that this is due solely to DNS name
resolution. I don't think that would account for such a big difference in
time--once the name was resolved to the IP address, behavior should be the
on the same machine where tomcat is installed. Using localhost is 20 times
slower than using IP address.
names - ip resolves take time . not caching the name - ip result will take
MUCH MORE TIME :))
Doesnt make a difference if I use Apache/AJP/Tomcat or Direct to
Tomcat web
server.
If
Sorry, if this is a duplicate.
Windows 2000
Tomcat 3.2.3
If I try to upload a file using the regular HTML/HTTP, there is a 20x
difference in performance
between using localhost vs the IP address in the Web Server URL. Ofcourse
I'm running the browser
on the same machine where
Windows 2000
Tomcat 3.2.3
If I try to upload a file using the regular HTML/HTTP, there is a 20x
difference in performance
between using localhost vs the IP address in the Web Server URL. Ofcourse
I'm running the browser
on the same machine where tomcat is installed. Using localhost is 20 times
