Hello,
I have tried to configure mod_jk as a load balancer WITH sticky sessions.
I get the load balancing to work perfectly, but NOT the sticky sessions.
This is what I tried:
I set up 4 "ajp13" workers and 2 "lb" workers.
Worker names are "t1_a", "t1_b", "t2_a" and "t2_b".
Load balancer names
On Wed, February 4, 2004 1at 1:31 am, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> Am I missing something very obvious?
>
> Do jvmRoutes need to have the same name as the workers? I find that
> strange, but I can't come up with something more logical...
Yes, they do.
-Dave
--
Hi,
You can try out these step-by-step instructions:
http://www.yorku.ca/dkha/tomcat/docs/apache-tomcat-modjk.htm
Regards,
Daniel
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried to configure mod_jk as a load balancer WITH sticky sessions.
>
> I get the lo
Thank you, Dave.
Do jvmRoutes need to have the same name as the workers?
Yes, they do.
Then that means I cannot have two AJP connectors on each Tomcat.
Proposed setup is, then:
Worker names are "t1" and "t2"
Load balancer name is "t":
t --> t1, t2
t1 --> tomcat 1 port X (jvmRoute="t1")
t
