e: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:44:56 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: security-constraint and error-page
>
>
> Thanks Craig. But I was wondering if there was some way
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:44:56 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: security-constraint and error-page
>
>
&g
List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: security-constraint and error-page
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:18:34 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAI
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:18:34 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: security-constraint and error-page
>
)
Thanks.
RS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/12/2002 09:33:47 PM
Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: security-constraint and error-page
I've setup a security constraint, with basic authentication, in a memory
realm. It works
I've setup a security constraint, with basic authentication, in a memory
realm. It works as expected until I add an error page for the 401 error
code (unauthorized). Then, when I request the page, I get the 401 error
page automatically and am never prompted to login. I was expecting to get
the 4