[tools-compilers] gcc vs SunStudio

2010-02-09 Thread George Vasick
One potential issue that I do know about is the -msave-args option. It is supported by gcc 3.4.3 but not gcc 4.3.x. In looking through the ON nightly logs, I see that we do use that option in our i386 builds. Thanks, George Alan Coopersmith wrote: > George Vasick wrote: >> Basabi Bhattachary

[tools-compilers] pkgadd failure - checkinstall script suspends

2010-02-09 Thread Shawn Walker
On 02/ 9/10 11:22 AM, Basabi Bhattacharya wrote: > I was attempting to install SunStudio12 patch and get the following error: > > pfexec pkgadd -d . SPROcc SVR4 package patches aren't supported on OpenSolaris 200x systems. The only supported way to install the latest version of Sun Studio is to

[tools-compilers] gcc vs SunStudio

2010-02-09 Thread Alan Coopersmith
George Vasick wrote: > Basabi Bhattacharya wrote: >> Would like to know if there is any disadvantages in compiling >> application/device drivers with Gcc (4.3.x) and running them on >> OpenSoalris (128a) built with Sunstudio12. I'd assume that all debugging >> tools (mdb and dtrace) should work as

[tools-compilers] gcc vs SunStudio

2010-02-09 Thread George Vasick
Basabi Bhattacharya wrote: > Would like to know if there is any disadvantages in compiling > application/device drivers with Gcc (4.3.x) and running them on > OpenSoalris (128a) built with Sunstudio12. I'd assume that all debugging > tools (mdb and dtrace) should work as expected. I was able to com

[tools-compilers] pkgadd failure - checkinstall script suspends

2010-02-09 Thread Basabi Bhattacharya
I was attempting to install SunStudio12 patch and get the following error: pfexec pkgadd -d . SPROcc Processing package instance from Sun Studio 12 C Compiler(i386) 12.0,REV=2007.05.03 Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. ## Executing checkinstall script. PaTcH_MsG 8 Ver