On Wed 26 Jul 2006 at 03:09PM, Stacey Marshall wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> from home I found my suggested fix for the Next Prev. buttons did not work
> and I have thus had
> to revert back to:
>
> parent.lhs.location.replace(parent.lhs.location.pathname + "#" + num);
> parent.rhs.location.repl
Hmm,
from home I found my suggested fix for the Next Prev. buttons did not work and
I have thus had
to revert back to:
parent.lhs.location.replace(parent.lhs.location.pathname + "#" + num);
parent.rhs.location.replace(parent.rhs.location.pathname + "#" + num);
To have both the b
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Scott Rotondo wrote:
John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:42:35PM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
frustrated with tracking integrations for Zones. We ended up tracking
1464 project bugs on SMF during its development...**
And a non-trivial number of those not req
Scott Rotondo wrote:
John Levon wrote:
[snip]
The problem as I see it was using the "official" category rather than
what we
use: development/kernel/xen
Yes, it's very important to keep the development bugs (which are found
and fixed in a project-private workspace before integration) se
John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:42:35PM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
frustrated with tracking integrations for Zones. We ended up tracking
1464 project bugs on SMF during its development...**
And a non-trivial number of those not required to be fixed for integration
ended up i
Hi Daniel,
Perhaps others have commented, I don't see the replies on the thread!
Certainly like the idea of placing the specific SCCS comments at the top of
each page and
providing the PDF file (something I create separately). The idea of creating a
patch is novel too.
With regard to the 'Fra
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:42:35PM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> frustrated with tracking integrations for Zones. We ended up tracking
> 1464 project bugs on SMF during its development...**
And a non-trivial number of those not required to be fixed for integration
ended up in bugster: thus th
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:08:57PM -0700, Dan Price wrote:
> http://cr.grommit.com/~dp/webrev.1/
Could the patch be "zones-fixes.diff" instead of just "patch"?
regards
john
___
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi all,
I suppose the criteria number 1 would be that the code must be open, if
not than I have been said that FoxBugz[1] is ubercool.
Apart from bugzilla that I consider rock solid and working and generally
good choice I'd deploy trac[2] today because it does more than bug
tracking, namely
