Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-08-25 02:48, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A merge-workspace has two parent changesets. > > You can use "hg stat -r parent" to look at the changes between the > active workspace state and any parent. This should have been "hg stat --rev parent" of course. I should read mo

Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-08-24 13:32, Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bill> one missing piece in an active-list-free world is having somewhere > Bill> to stash a draft change comment between the time when you make an > Bill> edit and the time

Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Mike Kupfer
> "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bill> one missing piece in an active-list-free world is having somewhere Bill> to stash a draft change comment between the time when you make an Bill> edit and the time you actually do the commit. Something that appears to be missing: an

Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 11:50 -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > That's a nice idea. While wx has serious performance issues, one thing > it did right was caching intentional changes to files in the workspace > made via wx. I made that change because I found the paradigm of first > having to do 'sccs edi

Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Will Fiveash
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:16:53AM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:07:30AM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > > > We could reasonably cache the changes from committed changesets, but > > caching uncommitted sections seems fruitless, as we'd have to do the > > stat (the slow part)

Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Danek Duvall
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:07:30AM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > We could reasonably cache the changes from committed changesets, but > caching uncommitted sections seems fruitless, as we'd have to do the > stat (the slow part) to tell if the cache was up-to-date, at which > point all benefit is lo

Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Richard Lowe
Tomas Zeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Vlada, > > there is a hg-active script which is called by webrev and dumps active > list to stdout. > > It calls Scm.WorkSpace.active() which gets filelist from 'hg outgoing' > and local 'hg stat'. I can't see in the code whether it creates some > cach

Re: [tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Tomas Zeman
Hi Vlada, there is a hg-active script which is called by webrev and dumps active list to stdout. It calls Scm.WorkSpace.active() which gets filelist from 'hg outgoing' and local 'hg stat'. I can't see in the code whether it creates some cachefile. I suspect it does 'hg out' and 'hg st' on every

[tools-discuss] Has cadmium active list ?

2007-08-24 Thread Vladimir Marek
Hi, Will cadmium have something similar to active list? Or will mercurial scan whole tree for every diff/status etc? Thanks -- Vlad pgp6Vhi9mR4cO.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org